- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
Senate panel approves DP bill, takes OPM to task
A Senate panel approved legislation last week that would provide domestic partner benefits to LGBT federal workers, but not before criticizing the Obama administration for allegedly not providing information on how to offset costs for the bill.
The Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee reported out the legislation — known as the Domestic Partnership Benefits & Obligations Act — on an 8-1 vote. The lone vote of dissent during the markup was Sen. Robert Bennett (R-Utah).
Counting the votes of senators who didn’t attend the markup and voted by proxy, the legislation was reported from the committee, 10-6.
The legislation, S. 1102, would make available to the same-sex partners of LGBT federal workers benefits afforded to the spouses of straight employees, including health and pension benefits.
Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement that the committee’s approval of the bill “is an important step toward guaranteeing equal compensation for lesbian and gay workers serving our government at home and abroad.”
But key supporters of the bill criticized the U.S. Office of Personnel Management during the markup for not explicitly providing information on how to offset the cost of the legislation — an estimated $63 million each year — and said a Senate floor vote wouldn’t take place until that data is provided.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), chair of the committee and sponsor of the bill, said he earlier asked OPM to provide information on costs offsets, but received no information by the time of the markup.
“We’re willing to do this and finance it within offsets from the existing OPM budget,” Lieberman said. “They were unable, for some reason, to get that information across to us this morning.”
Lieberman pledged that a Senate floor vote wouldn’t take place until OPM provides the information to senators. He had said earlier during an October committee hearing that he expected a floor vote on the bill early next year.
In a statement, OPM director John Berry, who is gay, responded to the comments from Lieberman and others by praising the committee for approving the legislation and promising to work with senators as the legislation progresses.
“I am confident that we will be able to work with [the Office of Management & Budget] and the Committee to address the concerns raised today so that forward progress can continue,” he said.
Both Lieberman and Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) praised the bill as a way for the federal government to compete with the private sector in attracting the most qualified workers.
Collins said the legislation would be particularly effective in attracting younger people to the federal workforce.
“It matters to them — whether they are straight or gay,” she said. “It matters to them because they view it as part of the offer that any good employer would provide.”
CPAC retains gay group as sponsor, despite boycott threats
A prominent, conservative convention is letting a gay group remain a co-sponsor despite threats from others who say they might boycott the event.
Organizers of the national Conservative Political Action Conference, set to take place in D.C. in February, are allowing GOProud, a gay conservative group, to continue as a co-sponsor in the face of calls to exclude it from the event.
Asked about the boycott threats, a CPAC spokesperson deferred to a statement from event director Lisa de Pasquale that was published this week in Hot Air, a conservative publication.
“After talking with their leadership and reviewing their web site, I am satisfied that they do not represent a ‘radical leftist agenda,’ as some have stated, and should not be rejected as a CPAC cosponsor,” she was quoted as saying.
On the agenda for GOProud, according to the organization’s web site, is repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and opposition to the Federal Marriage Amendment. It supports gun ownership rights and privatization of Social Security and favors repealing the estate tax. The group was among those that opposed the nomination of U.S. Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
Jimmy LaSalvia, executive director of GOProud, said he’s “excited” his organization will take part in the event, which some consider the most important annual gathering for conservatives.
“I just think that we’re excited to be a part of it,” he said. “I don’t have anything more to add to that. We’re just moving ahead and looking forward to being part of that important event.”
Although GOProud contributed $4,000 to co-sponsor CPAC, LaSalvia said a decision hasn’t been made yet on whether the group would have a speaking role at the event. He said more details would become known after a meeting in January. — By Chris Johnson
Tagged with CPAC, domestic partnership, Domestic Partnership Benefits & Obligations Act, gay conservative, GOProud, Joseph Lieberman, Senate, Susan Collins
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.