Comments on: Gay left smears GOP Senate hopeful Brown

By: libhomo

libhomo — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:49:26 +0000

Of course, self loathing gays like the author of this spin piece think it’s perfectly OK for bigots like Brown to attack two women adopting kids as “not normal.”

By: Alas, a blog » Blog Archive » How Obama Provides Cover For Anti-Gay Republicans

Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:18:38 +0000

[...] Barron of GOProud made a similar point: What’s the truth about Scott Brown? I will concede up front, that Scott Brown doesn’t support [...]

By: Dan Linehan

Dan Linehan — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:40:09 +0000

Dale that was by far the worst impression of a gay man I’ve ever seen.

By: Dale

Dale — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:59:48 +0000

As a gay man, I was proud to vote for Scott Brown. I am sick of the liberal leaders of our community labeling everyone ‘homophobes’. Scott Brown sincerely believes that our lifestyle choice is an unhealthy one and not appropriate for raising children. That doesn’t make him anti-gay. My bedroom antics aren’t the top priority in my life and he knows that.

There are so many more important national issues than endorsing artificial male/male marriages. We already have what could be characterized as “special rights” in many states that explicitly protect us in employment and housing. I’m proud of Log Cabin and GOProud for representing the majority of gay men who reject the liberal gay agenda.

By: Frank

Frank — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:01:18 +0000

“The Great Senator Kennedy?” Great as in having gotten away with murder, like the “Great” O J Simpson? And Martha Coakley is a huge GLBT supporter? ALL Democrats are amazingly supportive of gays and blacks when election
time rolls around, then shove them to the back burner. Just WHAT have democrats ever actually done for gays and blacks but made empty promises and kept the latter fully dependent on Government assistance? Yes, I am a gay man.

By: Thomas

Thomas — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:40:42 +0000

Martha Coakley is a huge LGBT supporter. As AG of Massachusetts, she is suing the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages. To urge people to stay home or support Brown is irresponsible and shameful for an LGBT publication. Shame on you.

By: Disneybear

Disneybear — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:02:34 +0000

As I stated on a blog referring to this original article. This article is a misleading. President Obama does not support gay marriage but he does support civil unions on the national level and has stated that gays and lesbians should have the same equality as those that are married. Scott Brown only supports civil unions on a state by state basis which isn’t the same thing. Actually using the term “support” is misleading, Scott Brown has not promised to do ANYTHING that would promote civil unions or increase gay civil rights! Scott Brown voted twice in Massachusetts to amend the state constitution to define marriage as between one man and one women. He even supported the original Travers amendment which would have forbid civil unions President Obama opposed DOMA and voted against the Federal Marriage amendment. He was against the California amendment of the constitution. He has also promised to reverse Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. While he may not have followed through on some of his promises yet, he has shown that he is at least interested in pursing rights for the LGBT community, while Scott Brown has remained silent. The big issue is that Scott Brown is not running against President Obama, but Martha Coakley! Martha Coakley has a measurable and outstanding record for supporting the GLBT community. She believes in marriage equality and has made history by filing a lawsuit to repeal DOMA. Even Martha Coakley’s Web site carefully specifies the gay and lesbian issues that still need work (a full repeal of DOMA and ’don’t ask, don’t tell,’ the military’s ban on gays and lesbians serving openly, as well as protection against hate crimes and ending housing discrimination) . Scott Brown promise nothing to the gay community and has NOT supported it in the past. There is no way that someone who has done their research can say that Scott Brown isn’t bad for the Gay community. He has a definite, measurable record of being ANTI-GAY! To quote a friend, “Gays voting for Scott Brown is like chickens voting for Col. Sanders!”

By: David B

David B — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:46:08 +0000

Well I wondered what the “Agenda” was. Now I know. It’s an agenda for shills masquerading as successors to the venerable Washington Blade.

By: David

David — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:01:23 +0000

Democrats need to wake up and realize that this race is more important than just local Mass issues. Who is elected could determine the direction many national issues will go. Dems need to get out and vote on tuesday or much will be lost for women rights, gay and lesbian rights, and democratic rights in general.

By: steel

steel — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:45:52 +0000

thank you Patric from saving me from all of that typing.
Brown is not in any way shape or form a friend of LGBT people and he would actively an rabidly work against us if elected.
he should stay in the centerfolds where his lackluster dangly bits are covered by his wrist…
L