ARCHIVES
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-
WGAY podcasts: April 26 and May 10
-
NYC officials condemn alleged anti-gay murder
-
Affleck mocks ‘ex-gay’ camps on SNL skit
-
Rehoboth Summer Kickoff Party
-
Thousands attend Puerto Rico LGBT rights march
-
Dems seeking to delay gay-inclusive immigration reform?
-
Puerto Rico Senate committee holds adoption bill hearing
WGAY podcast – "More Democratic disappointments"
By Staff reports on January 19, 2010
This week’s WGAY submission covers the Personal Agenda piece by Robert Turner, “More Democratic disappointments”
Filed under podcasts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
Tagged with WGAY
Tagged with WGAY
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.
Comments
© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2013. All rights reserved.


view print edition
It’s too painful to listen to the ignorance of these people, especially that one of them who didn’t even know that DADT is a law, not just a policy that the president can wipe out with a stroke of the pen.
[Translate]
DADT cannot be removed by the President alone. He could stop enforcement, and do something, anything, to start the process of removing it.
What would you suggest he do?
[Translate]
Interesting that the only podcasts in the podcast area here are from WGAY.
[Translate]
bsqrd, what I would suggest is that the president begin to show some leadership in getting the Democratic platform enacted. He has been unwilling to commit his political capital to anything except Afghanistan, where he seems to be intent on showing that he is no different from Republicans. He was elected to do what Democrats want, and he has been singularly ineffective in that regard.
I don’t want Obama to adopt Bush’s sleazy tactic of circumventing the law. I want the law changed. I have argued against my impatient friends who wanted Obama to act immediately on gay issues. I told myself I would give him a year to lay the groundwork and clear out more pressing issues. He has been unacceptably passive. My patience is gone.
[Translate]
Re: pogovio; agree with your frustration. However, I’d be worried that a direct approach might be analogous to running into a brick wall instead of stepping around it. Don’t get me wrong, I think an honest debate would benefit the country, and pressing these issues in public is good because visibility is essential to creating change… but pragmatically I can’t imagine any Democrat having enough of a spine to do it. We bang our heads, demanding bold, principled action every year the Democrats are in power, but nothing happens on LGBT issues beyond the “low-hanging fruit.” Perhaps an indirect approach via means out of the spotlight will achieve results faster, and the outdated laws (such as DADT) will disappear later. It’s not intellectually or emotionally satisfying, and it might even be called dirty, but to a great extent that’s how the game is played in Washington – and if you don’t play it, you don’t reap the rewards.
For LGBT issues, it’s kind of depressing to realize that our realistic direct political options are stasis with the Democrats, or backwards with Republicans. I think things will be much different in 10 or 20 years, because the younger generations in general “get it” on LGBT issues – in fact, it was never much of an “issue” for them to begin with. Change may be coming, but what we’re looking for isn’t to be found with this administration.
Dave (of http://www.wgay.fm)
[Translate]