<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chairmen sending mixed signals on ‘Don’t Ask’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%E2%80%98don%E2%80%99t-ask%E2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Massey</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Massey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=1362#comment-274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the military brass just needs to get used to the idea of gay troops. I do not want to see another ghetto institutionalized. but it seems to me there is a fairly (not entirely) ethical solution to the problem.

I suggest that we start by forming all-lgbtq troop units that are dedicated entirely to civil disaster relief and serve within and/or alongside traditional units; however, most traditional units we be freed up for other roles.

Over time, the remit of the Gay Brigade would grow to include essentially all Civil Affairs activities (reconstitution of civil authority, which was never really implemented properly in Iraq due to a severe lack of qualified personnel in the reserves). This would naturally lead to expansion of the Gay remit into Public Affairs, completing two of the three doctrinal pillars of military Information Operations. These are the areas in which the military seems least effective at the present time and turning these areas over to the lgbtq community would enable us to serve our fellow man in need directly and to introduce the military to our remarkable creative capabilities in dealing with incredibly complex and difficult problems.

It seems to me that this sequence of progressive participation in human services would make our military vastly more effective in saving lives, restoring social systems, and keeping the American people informed. In turn, this will lead to the Gay Brigade becoming a model for a new, more effective and ethical military focusing on responding to the needs of the downtrodden, rather than the needs of those who would tread upon them.

In times of destructive conflict, the lgbtq community serves as conservators and creatively inspired defenders. In times of peace, the lgbtq community serves as leaders, lovers, friends, and guides for humankind in developing our planetary society towards the full realization of the ideals of truth, beauty, goodness, and love in the working principles of liberty, freedom, equality, and justice for all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the military brass just needs to get used to the idea of gay troops. I do not want to see another ghetto institutionalized. but it seems to me there is a fairly (not entirely) ethical solution to the problem.</p>
<p>I suggest that we start by forming all-lgbtq troop units that are dedicated entirely to civil disaster relief and serve within and/or alongside traditional units; however, most traditional units we be freed up for other roles.</p>
<p>Over time, the remit of the Gay Brigade would grow to include essentially all Civil Affairs activities (reconstitution of civil authority, which was never really implemented properly in Iraq due to a severe lack of qualified personnel in the reserves). This would naturally lead to expansion of the Gay remit into Public Affairs, completing two of the three doctrinal pillars of military Information Operations. These are the areas in which the military seems least effective at the present time and turning these areas over to the lgbtq community would enable us to serve our fellow man in need directly and to introduce the military to our remarkable creative capabilities in dealing with incredibly complex and difficult problems.</p>
<p>It seems to me that this sequence of progressive participation in human services would make our military vastly more effective in saving lives, restoring social systems, and keeping the American people informed. In turn, this will lead to the Gay Brigade becoming a model for a new, more effective and ethical military focusing on responding to the needs of the downtrodden, rather than the needs of those who would tread upon them.</p>
<p>In times of destructive conflict, the lgbtq community serves as conservators and creatively inspired defenders. In times of peace, the lgbtq community serves as leaders, lovers, friends, and guides for humankind in developing our planetary society towards the full realization of the ideals of truth, beauty, goodness, and love in the working principles of liberty, freedom, equality, and justice for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=1362#comment-273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democratic Party is happy for the support of the GLBT community at election time but is not interested in advancing an agenda of equality. This is nothing new. Democrats are happy to continue the status quo, they just don&#039;t want to talk about it. The truth is, most Democrats couldnt get elected dog catcher without the suport of the GLBT community. Perhaps it&#039;s time we illustrate that point. Sure it may be cause for a tough election season or two, but Democrats will get the message. Really, how much harm can it do? Are we really better off now that we were during republican rule? Not to any meaningful extent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic Party is happy for the support of the GLBT community at election time but is not interested in advancing an agenda of equality. This is nothing new. Democrats are happy to continue the status quo, they just don&#8217;t want to talk about it. The truth is, most Democrats couldnt get elected dog catcher without the suport of the GLBT community. Perhaps it&#8217;s time we illustrate that point. Sure it may be cause for a tough election season or two, but Democrats will get the message. Really, how much harm can it do? Are we really better off now that we were during republican rule? Not to any meaningful extent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Snodgrass</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Snodgrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=1362#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.house.gov and www.senate.gov There ya go. Not hard at all. Does the Washington Post give you contact info? I don&#039;t think so. They gave you the name and state. That should be enough. And chances are they won&#039;t want to speak to you if you aren&#039;t in their district.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.house.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.house.gov</a> and <a href="http://www.senate.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov</a> There ya go. Not hard at all. Does the Washington Post give you contact info? I don&#8217;t think so. They gave you the name and state. That should be enough. And chances are they won&#8217;t want to speak to you if you aren&#8217;t in their district.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ballston</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Ballston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=1362#comment-271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why thanks for your words of advice DC Diva.  Unfortunately I do not keep phone books.  They, probably like you, are obsolete.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why thanks for your words of advice DC Diva.  Unfortunately I do not keep phone books.  They, probably like you, are obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Should Gays Do About the Democratic Party Problem?, Barney Frank Backtracks on Opposition to Senate Health Bill: &#8216;I was overreacting&#8217;, Armed Service Committee Chairman&#8217;s Sending Mixed Message on DADT, and More&#8230; &#187; DailyQu</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>What Should Gays Do About the Democratic Party Problem?, Barney Frank Backtracks on Opposition to Senate Health Bill: &#8216;I was overreacting&#8217;, Armed Service Committee Chairman&#8217;s Sending Mixed Message on DADT, and More&#8230; &#187; DailyQu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=1362#comment-270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The House and Senate Armed Service Committee Chairs have sent mixed messages about the repeal of &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; policy. The repeal is in the proposed Obama Defense Budget but will Senate Levine and Representative Skelton allow it to remain there is another story. Skelton has come out to say that he is opposed to repealing DADT. Levine hasn&#8217;t come out with any statement, the silence on his part is deafening. DADT has out lived is purpose with the discharge of gay linguists in a time of great need for national security purposes is more than putting our country in danger. As a lesbian who served in silence for 10 years it is time to lift the ban on gays and lesbians in the military. But has anyone really thought about when the ban is repealed that we have a new battle of getting Veteran&#8217;s Benefits for gay and lesbian partners and family members. DC Agenda does a good job of putting this all together but never once has VA benefits been mentioned in the arguement of repealing DADT. It is time to address both issues. Read more  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The House and Senate Armed Service Committee Chairs have sent mixed messages about the repeal of &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; policy. The repeal is in the proposed Obama Defense Budget but will Senate Levine and Representative Skelton allow it to remain there is another story. Skelton has come out to say that he is opposed to repealing DADT. Levine hasn&#8217;t come out with any statement, the silence on his part is deafening. DADT has out lived is purpose with the discharge of gay linguists in a time of great need for national security purposes is more than putting our country in danger. As a lesbian who served in silence for 10 years it is time to lift the ban on gays and lesbians in the military. But has anyone really thought about when the ban is repealed that we have a new battle of getting Veteran&#8217;s Benefits for gay and lesbian partners and family members. DC Agenda does a good job of putting this all together but never once has VA benefits been mentioned in the arguement of repealing DADT. It is time to address both issues. Read more  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=1362#comment-269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try a phone book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try a phone book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ballston</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Ballston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=1362#comment-268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How come the Agenda does not include email, telephone, and mail address contact information for these and other homophobic people in power?  I&#039;m sure many readers like myself would like to reply to such statement by people in power.  Come on Agenda.  Give us ALL the information!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come the Agenda does not include email, telephone, and mail address contact information for these and other homophobic people in power?  I&#8217;m sure many readers like myself would like to reply to such statement by people in power.  Come on Agenda.  Give us ALL the information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2010/01/20/chairmen-sending-mixed-signals-on-%E2%80%98don%E2%80%99t-ask%E2%80%99/feed/ ) in 0.31524 seconds, on May 25th, 2013 at 9:21 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 25th, 2013 at 10:21 am UTC -->