<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/08/majority-backs-gay-marriage-ballot-measure-in-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/08/majority-backs-gay-marriage-ballot-measure-in-poll/</link>
	<description>the lgbtq communitys news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:03:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll &#124; DC Agenda &#171; Ardente</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/08/majority-backs-gay-marriage-ballot-measure-in-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll &#124; DC Agenda &#171; Ardente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcagenda.com/?p=2216#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>[...] More here: Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll &#124; DC Agenda [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More here: Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll | DC Agenda [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll &#124; DC Agenda &#124; MyGaySpot</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/08/majority-backs-gay-marriage-ballot-measure-in-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll &#124; DC Agenda &#124; MyGaySpot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcagenda.com/?p=2216#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>[...] the original:  Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll &#124; DC Agenda AKPC_IDS += &quot;6138,&quot;;Popularity: unranked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original:  Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll | DC Agenda AKPC_IDS += &quot;6138,&quot;;Popularity: unranked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/08/majority-backs-gay-marriage-ballot-measure-in-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcagenda.com/?p=2216#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by DCAgenda: Majority of D.C. residents back gay marriage, ballot measure in poll. Story at http://bit.ly/9HgxuR...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by DCAgenda: Majority of D.C. residents back gay marriage, ballot measure in poll. Story at <a href="http://bit.ly/9HgxuR.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9HgxuR..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll &#124; DC Agenda Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/08/majority-backs-gay-marriage-ballot-measure-in-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll &#124; DC Agenda Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcagenda.com/?p=2216#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>[...] Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll &#124; DC Agenda Tags: activists-familiar, although-the-poll, issue, legalized-same-sex, lgbt, other-states, percent-support, poll, poll-results, states, the-issue, the-poll, time       Beck and the Birthers &#124; Western Journalism.comFirst issue of Mass Effect iPhone comic free on launch dayHollywood Dreamland: Poll Results: Mae WestCole taking positives &#124; News &#124; Latest News &#124; News &#124; West Ham UnitedThe Fergus Falls Daily Journal - Drink, drive, arrest, repeatSocialMC » Blog Archive » Explain the reasons for Stalin&#039;s triumph &#8230;LOATAY.COM - Brown asked to explain cutbacks in Pakistan &#8230;Gordon Brown asked to explain cutbacks in Pakistan &#8230;Robert Downey Jr. drops western for Sherlock Holmes sequel &#8230;Bob Piper : Liberate Western Sahara          View the Contact Powered by Tools [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Majority backs gay marriage, ballot measure in poll | DC Agenda Tags: activists-familiar, although-the-poll, issue, legalized-same-sex, lgbt, other-states, percent-support, poll, poll-results, states, the-issue, the-poll, time       Beck and the Birthers | Western Journalism.comFirst issue of Mass Effect iPhone comic free on launch dayHollywood Dreamland: Poll Results: Mae WestCole taking positives | News | Latest News | News | West Ham UnitedThe Fergus Falls Daily Journal &#8211; Drink, drive, arrest, repeatSocialMC » Blog Archive » Explain the reasons for Stalin&#39;s triumph &#8230;LOATAY.COM &#8211; Brown asked to explain cutbacks in Pakistan &#8230;Gordon Brown asked to explain cutbacks in Pakistan &#8230;Robert Downey Jr. drops western for Sherlock Holmes sequel &#8230;Bob Piper : Liberate Western Sahara          View the Contact Powered by Tools [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/08/majority-backs-gay-marriage-ballot-measure-in-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>John B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcagenda.com/?p=2216#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>Well, imagine that. We DC residents overwhelmingly elected an unabashedly liberal city council, most of whom have always been strongly supportive of gay rights in general and same-sex marriage in particular, and they voted overwhelmingly (11-2) to allow gay couples to marry, and the mayor we overwhelmingly elected signed it into law.  But it&#039;s nice to have confirmation that our DC Council and mayor aren&#039;t so out-of-touch with their constituents as people like Harry Jackson and his Republicans friends in Congress who want to force a referendum on us would have everybody believe. What they call an &quot;out-of-control city council&quot; is largely representative of the city, but apparently they don&#039;t believe in the principles of representative democracy as set out in the U.S. Constitution and D.C. charter. As such, the people make their will heard through their representatives, and that is what has happened here in DC.

Our ELECTED DC Council and our ELECTED mayor have spoken, and in doing so they are doing the precise job we elected them to do. But the opponents of same-sex marriage would have us believe they are doing it in the name of democracy--&quot;the people have a right to be heard&quot; (and apparently they weren&#039;t &quot;heard&quot; when they went out and voted in the last election???)--but having lost in every legal venue in the District, they are turning to Congress to get their way. They apparently don&#039;t see the irony that having Congress--none of whom ANY of us DC residents ever had a chance to vote for--step in to overrule our ELECTED representatives and mayor and tell us what to do is the exact opposite of democracy. And to do what? To allow the civil rights of a minority to be put to a vote by the majority. Shame on all of them, they&#039;ve helped put the last nail in the coffin of the civil rights movement.

Unfortunately this won&#039;t stop the opponents of same-sex marriage.  If the majority were much larger it might make a difference but as it stands now don&#039;t count on the anti-marriage forces singing a different tune after this poll--if anything it will embolden them because now they can taunt us, &quot;what are you so afraid of?&quot;  56% is a pretty strong majority but not invulnerable, especially if they bring in millions of dollars from outside groups and use slimy fear-mongering tactics as happened in both Maine and California--two other states where larger majorities than polls suggested ultimately voted to overturn same-sex marriage.

Having lost in both the courts (where they railed against &quot;unelected judges&quot; and &quot;judicial tyranny&quot; and &quot;legislating from the bench&quot;) and the (elected!) legislature (DC&#039;s &quot;out-of-touch City Council&quot;), the anti-marriage side claims to be respecting the &quot;will of the people&quot; in putting same-sex marriage up for a popular vote; in reality all they want is to outlaw same-sex marriage, by any means necessary, and they are counting on that happening if it is put to a vote.

But the bottom line, which so many people seem to be missing, is why should ANYBODY&#039;S civil rights be put to a popular vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, imagine that. We DC residents overwhelmingly elected an unabashedly liberal city council, most of whom have always been strongly supportive of gay rights in general and same-sex marriage in particular, and they voted overwhelmingly (11-2) to allow gay couples to marry, and the mayor we overwhelmingly elected signed it into law.  But it&#8217;s nice to have confirmation that our DC Council and mayor aren&#8217;t so out-of-touch with their constituents as people like Harry Jackson and his Republicans friends in Congress who want to force a referendum on us would have everybody believe. What they call an &#8220;out-of-control city council&#8221; is largely representative of the city, but apparently they don&#8217;t believe in the principles of representative democracy as set out in the U.S. Constitution and D.C. charter. As such, the people make their will heard through their representatives, and that is what has happened here in DC.</p>
<p>Our ELECTED DC Council and our ELECTED mayor have spoken, and in doing so they are doing the precise job we elected them to do. But the opponents of same-sex marriage would have us believe they are doing it in the name of democracy&#8211;&#8221;the people have a right to be heard&#8221; (and apparently they weren&#8217;t &#8220;heard&#8221; when they went out and voted in the last election???)&#8211;but having lost in every legal venue in the District, they are turning to Congress to get their way. They apparently don&#8217;t see the irony that having Congress&#8211;none of whom ANY of us DC residents ever had a chance to vote for&#8211;step in to overrule our ELECTED representatives and mayor and tell us what to do is the exact opposite of democracy. And to do what? To allow the civil rights of a minority to be put to a vote by the majority. Shame on all of them, they&#8217;ve helped put the last nail in the coffin of the civil rights movement.</p>
<p>Unfortunately this won&#8217;t stop the opponents of same-sex marriage.  If the majority were much larger it might make a difference but as it stands now don&#8217;t count on the anti-marriage forces singing a different tune after this poll&#8211;if anything it will embolden them because now they can taunt us, &#8220;what are you so afraid of?&#8221;  56% is a pretty strong majority but not invulnerable, especially if they bring in millions of dollars from outside groups and use slimy fear-mongering tactics as happened in both Maine and California&#8211;two other states where larger majorities than polls suggested ultimately voted to overturn same-sex marriage.</p>
<p>Having lost in both the courts (where they railed against &#8220;unelected judges&#8221; and &#8220;judicial tyranny&#8221; and &#8220;legislating from the bench&#8221;) and the (elected!) legislature (DC&#8217;s &#8220;out-of-touch City Council&#8221;), the anti-marriage side claims to be respecting the &#8220;will of the people&#8221; in putting same-sex marriage up for a popular vote; in reality all they want is to outlaw same-sex marriage, by any means necessary, and they are counting on that happening if it is put to a vote.</p>
<p>But the bottom line, which so many people seem to be missing, is why should ANYBODY&#8217;S civil rights be put to a popular vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 18/28 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk

Served from: www.washingtonblade.com @ 2010-09-02 15:46:23 -->