<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democratic retirements could derail LGBT advances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Love</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Brian,

You said &quot;I vote for the democratic party in California because they openly support my equal rights and actually pass legislation that matters&quot;.
Then why is marriage not one of them in California????

And since you said &quot;Obama is a ineffective administrator. I do not support him&quot; But I bet you all supported Bill Clinton who is the reason our community is where it is now with D.A.D.T and D.O.M.A.

After all Obama and congress did pass bills that supports this community. But I guess in all your not liking him. You forgot that. right????
Hate Crimes Bills passed. HIV travel ban lifted and it doesn&#039;t matter if it&#039;s attached to anything .It was passed. THAT&#039;S ALL THAT MATTERS!

Alot of Democratic congress memebers are not supporting him because they&#039;re scared for their re-election because of angry white teabaggers!. So ineffective not really. He has a party that is sometimey with him. That is why it makes him look ineffective. If I represented a district predominately caucasian coming to my town halls screaming and carrying on STUPIDLY.It would probably make me punk out and run the other way. NOT, I&#039;d MAN UP and take a stand!

So before you step to me with saying &quot;smarten up&quot;. And get over yourself. I don&#039;t care who you support that&#039;s your business but guess what. If republicans come to power. You won&#039;t be getting much of anything passed for this community! including marriage......

OH WAIT I FORGOT YOUR FROM CALIFORNIA YOU CAN&#039;T GET MARRIED ANYWAY!

IOWA anyone?????

Smarten up yourself!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Brian,</p>
<p>You said &#8220;I vote for the democratic party in California because they openly support my equal rights and actually pass legislation that matters&#8221;.<br />
Then why is marriage not one of them in California????</p>
<p>And since you said &#8220;Obama is a ineffective administrator. I do not support him&#8221; But I bet you all supported Bill Clinton who is the reason our community is where it is now with D.A.D.T and D.O.M.A.</p>
<p>After all Obama and congress did pass bills that supports this community. But I guess in all your not liking him. You forgot that. right????<br />
Hate Crimes Bills passed. HIV travel ban lifted and it doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s attached to anything .It was passed. THAT&#8217;S ALL THAT MATTERS!</p>
<p>Alot of Democratic congress memebers are not supporting him because they&#8217;re scared for their re-election because of angry white teabaggers!. So ineffective not really. He has a party that is sometimey with him. That is why it makes him look ineffective. If I represented a district predominately caucasian coming to my town halls screaming and carrying on STUPIDLY.It would probably make me punk out and run the other way. NOT, I&#8217;d MAN UP and take a stand!</p>
<p>So before you step to me with saying &#8220;smarten up&#8221;. And get over yourself. I don&#8217;t care who you support that&#8217;s your business but guess what. If republicans come to power. You won&#8217;t be getting much of anything passed for this community! including marriage&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>OH WAIT I FORGOT YOUR FROM CALIFORNIA YOU CAN&#8217;T GET MARRIED ANYWAY!</p>
<p>IOWA anyone?????</p>
<p>Smarten up yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christy Love, why do you bring race into this?  I vote for the democratic party in California because they openly support my equal rights and actually pass legislation that matters.  Obama does not support my equality and is an ineffective administrator.   I do not support him.  When losers like Boehner and Cantor can run rings around this administration to the point they are now poised to take back congress, you have to question Obama&#039;s competency for his position.  I am not voting for Barbara Boxer either because she talks and delivers nothing.  And I am a 46 year old man Chrisy, not a girl.  Smarten up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christy Love, why do you bring race into this?  I vote for the democratic party in California because they openly support my equal rights and actually pass legislation that matters.  Obama does not support my equality and is an ineffective administrator.   I do not support him.  When losers like Boehner and Cantor can run rings around this administration to the point they are now poised to take back congress, you have to question Obama&#8217;s competency for his position.  I am not voting for Barbara Boxer either because she talks and delivers nothing.  And I am a 46 year old man Chrisy, not a girl.  Smarten up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Dardano</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Dardano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s very doubtful there will be any advances in GLBT legislation for the remainder of this congressional session.  Almost to a person, Republicans in Congress hate us.  And Democrats, having proved to be feckless and nearly incapable of governing, are now running scared to save their own hides in advance of a feared tea party tsunami.  I hope I&#039;m wrong, but the Democrats are going to avoid pro-GLBT legislation at all costs as they attempt a phony lurch to the middle.  And anyone who thinks a reduced Democratic majority, or any Republican majority for that matter, in the next Congress will be more amenable to our issues is just delusional.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very doubtful there will be any advances in GLBT legislation for the remainder of this congressional session.  Almost to a person, Republicans in Congress hate us.  And Democrats, having proved to be feckless and nearly incapable of governing, are now running scared to save their own hides in advance of a feared tea party tsunami.  I hope I&#8217;m wrong, but the Democrats are going to avoid pro-GLBT legislation at all costs as they attempt a phony lurch to the middle.  And anyone who thinks a reduced Democratic majority, or any Republican majority for that matter, in the next Congress will be more amenable to our issues is just delusional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like I said, Evan Bayh is no great loss for us as we pursue equality. I put together a kind of report card for President Obama and the Democrats in Congress and sent a copy to Speaker Pelosi, House Majority Leader Hoyer, and Senate Majority Leader Reid, which basically lays out a roadmap of what they promised to achieve and have achieved as follows:

Grading Obama &amp; The 111th Democratic Congress
LGBT Issues

Main Bills / Votes on the Bills
15 pts. – Pass Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act
15 pts. – Pass Employment Non-Discrimination Act (S.1584 / HR.3017)
15 pts. – Pass Domestic Partnership Benefits &amp; Obligations Act (S.1102 / HR.2517)
15 pts. – Repeal Defense of Marriage Act (HR.3567) Respect for Marriage Act
15 pts. – Repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy (HR.1283) Military Readiness Enhancement Act
3 pts. – Pass Student Non-Discrimination Act (HR.4530)
3 pts. – Renew the Ryan White Care Act (S.833 / HR.1616) Early Treatment for HIV Act
3 pts. – Pass Uniting American Families Act (S.424 / HR.1024)
3 pts. – Pass Safe Schools Improvement Act (HR.2262)
3 pts. – Pass Responsible Education About Life Act (S.611 / HR.1551)
5 pts. – Appoint an openly gay cabinet secretary or US. Supreme Court Justice
1-5 pts. – One point for each Federal Judge (District or Appeals) Appointed by Obama up to five

100 Potential Points for President Obama &amp; The Democrats in 111th Congress.
18 Points Out of 100 Potential Points have been earned as of 2/15/10 for passing the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Bill and renewing the Ryan White Care Act.

At this point, it isn&#039;t likely the Dems will take up the repeal of DOMA, so the best case scenario would involve the Democrats passing the Domestic Partnership Benefits &amp; Obligations Act, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and Repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell; along with passage of at least two of the minor Pro-LGBT bills, such as the Student Non-Discrimination Act, Safe Schools Improvement Act, or Responsible Education About Life Act. Senator Schumer recently recommended Daniel Alter, an openly gay man for an open seat on a Federal District Court, so that could mean an additional point for President Obama and the Democrats during this Congress. Based on these bills passing, the best case score is approximately 70 of 100.

A worst case scenario assumes Congress and the President will continue to neglect the Gay &amp; Lesbian community and its issues, moving at a much slower pace as it grudgingly passes Pro-LGBT Legislation. This scenario would involve the Democrats passing only one of the main bills, (DPBO, ENDA, or Repeal of DADT) and one of the minor bills with no appointments of LGBT Judges for the Federal Judiciary, with a resulting score of 36 of 100. This scenario would most likely result in a massive desertion by the LGBT Community as it responds to the Democrat’s failure to deliver on their promises.

An acceptable scenario for the LGBT Community would involve the Democrats passing at least two of the main bills, (DPBO, ENDA, or Repeal of DADT) along with two of the minor LGBT Bills and the appointment of at least one openly gay Federal Judge, with a respectable score of 55 of 100 for President Obama and the Democrats in the 111th Congress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said, Evan Bayh is no great loss for us as we pursue equality. I put together a kind of report card for President Obama and the Democrats in Congress and sent a copy to Speaker Pelosi, House Majority Leader Hoyer, and Senate Majority Leader Reid, which basically lays out a roadmap of what they promised to achieve and have achieved as follows:</p>
<p>Grading Obama &amp; The 111th Democratic Congress<br />
LGBT Issues</p>
<p>Main Bills / Votes on the Bills<br />
15 pts. – Pass Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act<br />
15 pts. – Pass Employment Non-Discrimination Act (S.1584 / HR.3017)<br />
15 pts. – Pass Domestic Partnership Benefits &amp; Obligations Act (S.1102 / HR.2517)<br />
15 pts. – Repeal Defense of Marriage Act (HR.3567) Respect for Marriage Act<br />
15 pts. – Repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy (HR.1283) Military Readiness Enhancement Act<br />
3 pts. – Pass Student Non-Discrimination Act (HR.4530)<br />
3 pts. – Renew the Ryan White Care Act (S.833 / HR.1616) Early Treatment for HIV Act<br />
3 pts. – Pass Uniting American Families Act (S.424 / HR.1024)<br />
3 pts. – Pass Safe Schools Improvement Act (HR.2262)<br />
3 pts. – Pass Responsible Education About Life Act (S.611 / HR.1551)<br />
5 pts. – Appoint an openly gay cabinet secretary or US. Supreme Court Justice<br />
1-5 pts. – One point for each Federal Judge (District or Appeals) Appointed by Obama up to five</p>
<p>100 Potential Points for President Obama &amp; The Democrats in 111th Congress.<br />
18 Points Out of 100 Potential Points have been earned as of 2/15/10 for passing the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Bill and renewing the Ryan White Care Act.</p>
<p>At this point, it isn&#8217;t likely the Dems will take up the repeal of DOMA, so the best case scenario would involve the Democrats passing the Domestic Partnership Benefits &amp; Obligations Act, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and Repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell; along with passage of at least two of the minor Pro-LGBT bills, such as the Student Non-Discrimination Act, Safe Schools Improvement Act, or Responsible Education About Life Act. Senator Schumer recently recommended Daniel Alter, an openly gay man for an open seat on a Federal District Court, so that could mean an additional point for President Obama and the Democrats during this Congress. Based on these bills passing, the best case score is approximately 70 of 100.</p>
<p>A worst case scenario assumes Congress and the President will continue to neglect the Gay &amp; Lesbian community and its issues, moving at a much slower pace as it grudgingly passes Pro-LGBT Legislation. This scenario would involve the Democrats passing only one of the main bills, (DPBO, ENDA, or Repeal of DADT) and one of the minor bills with no appointments of LGBT Judges for the Federal Judiciary, with a resulting score of 36 of 100. This scenario would most likely result in a massive desertion by the LGBT Community as it responds to the Democrat’s failure to deliver on their promises.</p>
<p>An acceptable scenario for the LGBT Community would involve the Democrats passing at least two of the main bills, (DPBO, ENDA, or Repeal of DADT) along with two of the minor LGBT Bills and the appointment of at least one openly gay Federal Judge, with a respectable score of 55 of 100 for President Obama and the Democrats in the 111th Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Whom</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Whom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christy Love:  So we should be happy with barely closeted homophobes just because they&#039;re not quite so bad as militant, in-your-face homophobes?  If we all followed that principle, we&#039;d still be living under pre-Stonewall conditions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christy Love:  So we should be happy with barely closeted homophobes just because they&#8217;re not quite so bad as militant, in-your-face homophobes?  If we all followed that principle, we&#8217;d still be living under pre-Stonewall conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Love</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OOOPS I meant &quot;CONSERVATIVES&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOOPS I meant &#8220;CONSERVATIVES&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Love</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You girls will always have those white conservativwes to vote for since Obama is a do nothing President in your words that is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You girls will always have those white conservativwes to vote for since Obama is a do nothing President in your words that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheColu.mn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The National: HRC Gives Up On Leadership From Obama On DADT?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>TheColu.mn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The National: HRC Gives Up On Leadership From Obama On DADT?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8211; The DC Agenda thinks that because Indiana Senator Evan Bayh voted in favor of LGBT rights on a few, very safe pieces of legislation, his impending retirement [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; The DC Agenda thinks that because Indiana Senator Evan Bayh voted in favor of LGBT rights on a few, very safe pieces of legislation, his impending retirement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reg</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Brian.  The dems had their chance and they blew it.  The truth is that the only legistation the democrats have given us is DOMA.  Some show of support for LGBT rights.  I truly believe that deep down, Obama does not support gay marriage or other gay rights.  I am sure that is what was taught to him by the Rev Wright.  Remember when we threw our support behind Kerry/Edwards?  Both of them supported consitutional bans on gay marriage.  The truth is that the dems could care less about us.  They only want (and need) out vote, so they will say just about anything to get that vote.  Its time we start supporting candidates that support the LGBT issues and not just throw our support because of the (D) after their name.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brian.  The dems had their chance and they blew it.  The truth is that the only legistation the democrats have given us is DOMA.  Some show of support for LGBT rights.  I truly believe that deep down, Obama does not support gay marriage or other gay rights.  I am sure that is what was taught to him by the Rev Wright.  Remember when we threw our support behind Kerry/Edwards?  Both of them supported consitutional bans on gay marriage.  The truth is that the dems could care less about us.  They only want (and need) out vote, so they will say just about anything to get that vote.  Its time we start supporting candidates that support the LGBT issues and not just throw our support because of the (D) after their name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NH House Voting On Gay Marriage Repeal Measure, Obama Elusive on About-Face on Same-Sex Marriage, Supreme Court to Hear Gay Rights Case on April 28, and more&#8230; &#187; DailyQueerNews.com</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>NH House Voting On Gay Marriage Repeal Measure, Obama Elusive on About-Face on Same-Sex Marriage, Supreme Court to Hear Gay Rights Case on April 28, and more&#8230; &#187; DailyQueerNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=2614#comment-665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] case to be heard. Read more  DC Agenda writes about Democrats retiring could hurt LGBT advances. Read more  Senate bill could force vote on same-sex marriage. Read more  Senator Lindsay Graham wants more [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case to be heard. Read more  DC Agenda writes about Democrats retiring could hurt LGBT advances. Read more  Senate bill could force vote on same-sex marriage. Read more  Senator Lindsay Graham wants more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2010/02/16/democratic-retirements-could-derail-lgbt-advances/feed/ ) in 0.31329 seconds, on Jun 18th, 2013 at 9:57 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jun 18th, 2013 at 10:57 pm UTC -->