- Ron Paul’s heartless stance on health care
- Gay cop says dog shooting was necessary
- Young, gay caucus-goers talk politics, support for GOP
- Polis reintroduces Student Non-Discrimination Act
- Can you be a good gay and conservative?
- Blade reporter attacked, robbed in Rehoboth Beach
- New report undermines officers’ letter supporting ‘Don’t Ask’
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
Stonewall seeks pro-LGBT Democratic candidate to replace Bayh
The National Stonewall Democrats have launched an initiative to put a pro-LGBT Democratic nominee on the ballot this year for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by retiring Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.).
The organization is asking supporters to sign a petition to persuade the Indiana Democratic Party to select a nominee who would back pro-LGBT legislation in Congress.
Bayh announced his resignation on Monday, one day before the due date when candidates had to submit petition signatures to qualify as a Democratic candidate in the upcoming Senate race. No one submitted enough signatures, so the Indiana Democratic Party will select a nominee to run in the general election.
Michael Mitchell, Stonewall’s executive director, said on Thursday “a decent number” of people have already signed his organization’s petition, although he wasn’t sure exactly how many names had been gathered. He said he would love to have several thousand supporters sign and said people from out-of-state are eligible.
“We would love to see that seat go to a pro-equality Democrat, not just for the folks in Indiana — which would be wonderful because they certainly deserve that — but I think the rest of the country deserves to have more pro-equality elected officials in the House and the Senate,” Mitchell said.
Despite this effort from Stonewall, media sources are reporting that Rep. Brad Ellsworth (D-Ind.) is the expected Democratic nominee for the seat and the lawmaker may soon announce his candidacy.
Ellsworth is hardly a pro-LGBT candidate. He’s voiced support for amendment to a U.S. Constitution banning same-sex marriage throughout the country. Ellsworth voted twice against hate crimes protections legislation, although in 2007 he voted in favor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.
Even with this reporting, Mitchell said he’s “not so sure” Ellsworth has been designated as the nominee and said the petition may “shake things up a bit and maybe move that person closer to where we are.”
Mitchell said he doesn’t have a particular candidate in mind that the Indiana Democratic Party could select as the nominee for the Senate race.
Asked whether he thinks a pro-LGBT Senate candidate can win in Indiana, which is known to be a conservative state, Mitchell said such a contender “can win anywhere if they’re the right candidate.”
“We need to start articulating better that LGBT values are American values,” he said. “We want to make sure that we have the same rights to take care of our families that other familes have. I think what we need are candidates who can articulate that in a way that folks get it.”
Tagged with Brad Ellsworth, Election 2010, Evan Bayh, Indiana, Michael Mitchell, National Stonewall Democrats, U.S. Senate
-
[...] a mad rush to get Democratic candidates on the ballot. The National Stonewall Democrats want an LGBT-friendly candidate to represent the former stronghold of the KKK, instead of the Blue Dog currently on offer from the [...]

view print edition
PRO-gay? No, let’s help put in a GAY Pol to replace Bayh. From now on, political parties will be getting their financing, marching orders and talking points from major, multinational donor corporations. So, they will not miss our Gay Dollars if we finance our own LGBT politicians, instead of any Party. It is the only way forward.
[Translate]
BTW, as good reason for this, or food for thought: has anyone noticed the numbers of people on comments forums ADVOCATING for the penalization, or even execution of gays in the USA too? Saying that Uganda has it right, that we need to “deal with the homo problem”, clean the gene pool, that AIDS is a “gay disease” (but heterosexual sex is never risky to anyone). Thanks to evangelical christians and “The Family” meddling in Uganda politics, our fight is no longer just “equality” or marriage. See, we have to “debate” maggie gallagher and others about whether we’re “allowed” inside a political movement or not? Our fight has also become stopping the fascist talk against us from becoming fascist POLITICS which threaten our well-being.
[Translate]