<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panelists hammer White House on ‘Don’t Ask’ position</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/02/panelists-hammer-white-house-on-%E2%80%98don%E2%80%99t-ask%E2%80%99-position/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/02/panelists-hammer-white-house-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99-position/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Wonk Room &#187; By Embracing Lieberman&#8217;s Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell Bill, Obama Can Satisfy Gates And Repeal Proponents</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/02/panelists-hammer-white-house-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99-position/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonk Room &#187; By Embracing Lieberman&#8217;s Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell Bill, Obama Can Satisfy Gates And Repeal Proponents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 20:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=6572#comment-1380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] say whether the White House supports such a move but said an endorsement of such a proposal is part of an &#8216;ongoing discussion.&#8217; “I think that’s an ongoing discussion right now,” Bond replied. “Again, there are several [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] say whether the White House supports such a move but said an endorsement of such a proposal is part of an &#8216;ongoing discussion.&#8217; “I think that’s an ongoing discussion right now,” Bond replied. “Again, there are several [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlon Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/02/panelists-hammer-white-house-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99-position/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlon Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=6572#comment-1379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was at both panel discussions and I think the most damning thing that Lt. Dan Choi said was that Obama&#039;s LGBT appointees were &quot;tokens.&quot;

I am in full support of Choi and hope DADT is repealed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at both panel discussions and I think the most damning thing that Lt. Dan Choi said was that Obama&#8217;s LGBT appointees were &#8220;tokens.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am in full support of Choi and hope DADT is repealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael @ LeonardMatlovich.com</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/02/panelists-hammer-white-house-on-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99-position/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael @ LeonardMatlovich.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 17:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=6572#comment-1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. It&#039;s not &quot;defense budget&quot; but &quot;defense authorization&quot; to which we want to attach repeal.

2. Third-party outings are still ENTIRELY permissable. The ONLY way the new regs could affect them is if he/she refuses to make his/her accusation under oath, and NO evidence has been submitted that any measurable # would refuse to do that. Everything we know about the guy who outed Victor Fehrenbach screams that he would have rented a tuxedo, a limo, and a marching band for his oath taking. The woman who outed Margie Witt of the famous 9th Circuit Court decision would undoubtedly have done the same thing under oath. The woman who outed Servicemembers United&#039;s Alex Nicholson—ditto. The person who discovered incriminating letters from Mike Almy who is speaking at today&#039;s rally and testified recently before Congress—ditto.

3. Obama &quot;got the ball rolling&quot;??? NO, he&#039;s playing &quot;run out the clock&quot; until the buzzer sounds and repeal is LOST!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. It&#8217;s not &#8220;defense budget&#8221; but &#8220;defense authorization&#8221; to which we want to attach repeal.</p>
<p>2. Third-party outings are still ENTIRELY permissable. The ONLY way the new regs could affect them is if he/she refuses to make his/her accusation under oath, and NO evidence has been submitted that any measurable # would refuse to do that. Everything we know about the guy who outed Victor Fehrenbach screams that he would have rented a tuxedo, a limo, and a marching band for his oath taking. The woman who outed Margie Witt of the famous 9th Circuit Court decision would undoubtedly have done the same thing under oath. The woman who outed Servicemembers United&#8217;s Alex Nicholson—ditto. The person who discovered incriminating letters from Mike Almy who is speaking at today&#8217;s rally and testified recently before Congress—ditto.</p>
<p>3. Obama &#8220;got the ball rolling&#8221;??? NO, he&#8217;s playing &#8220;run out the clock&#8221; until the buzzer sounds and repeal is LOST!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/02/panelists-hammer-white-house-on-%E2%80%98don%E2%80%99t-ask%E2%80%99-position/feed/ ) in 0.30395 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 6:46 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2013 at 7:46 am UTC -->