<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marriage equality gaining acceptance in Md.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/11/marriage-equality-gaining-acceptance-in-md/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/11/marriage-equality-gaining-acceptance-in-md/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:19:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/11/marriage-equality-gaining-acceptance-in-md/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 21:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=7075#comment-1477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we could engage with these people on an intellectual level rather than an emotional one, we might have some chance of changing minds.  It&#039;s obvious that we are being successful with many people, I just don&#039;t know how we get to a significant majority that leaves the religious fundamentalists to their own devises.

One way to potentially open some eyes would be to the fact that they are using their religion to deny civil rights would be to suggest a campaign that forbids remarriage of all divorced people who have not obtained an annulment from the Pope.  That should be a sufficient wake up call if they thought it was possible to happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we could engage with these people on an intellectual level rather than an emotional one, we might have some chance of changing minds.  It&#8217;s obvious that we are being successful with many people, I just don&#8217;t know how we get to a significant majority that leaves the religious fundamentalists to their own devises.</p>
<p>One way to potentially open some eyes would be to the fact that they are using their religion to deny civil rights would be to suggest a campaign that forbids remarriage of all divorced people who have not obtained an annulment from the Pope.  That should be a sufficient wake up call if they thought it was possible to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sarginson</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/11/marriage-equality-gaining-acceptance-in-md/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sarginson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=7075#comment-1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[surely it is everyones right to live in partnership with the person they love.  This is not dependent on gender.  We need to educate people to understand that the emotions involved in love are the same for us all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>surely it is everyones right to live in partnership with the person they love.  This is not dependent on gender.  We need to educate people to understand that the emotions involved in love are the same for us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2010/05/11/marriage-equality-gaining-acceptance-in-md/feed/ ) in 0.27721 seconds, on May 20th, 2013 at 6:30 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2013 at 7:30 am UTC -->