<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prop 8 case wraps up, ruling expected in weeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/06/17/prop-8-case-wraps-up-ruling-expected-in-weeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/06/17/prop-8-case-wraps-up-ruling-expected-in-weeks/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/06/17/prop-8-case-wraps-up-ruling-expected-in-weeks/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=8931#comment-1877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, until SCOTUS does enter this &quot;mine field in the culture wars,&quot; individual states are going to continue doing precisely what they have been doing all along; allowing the rights of their citizens to be placed on a public ballot.

I, for one, am sick to death of that whole thing. At the rate we&#039;re rate, I&#039;m going to be an 80 year old man before I&#039;m finally able to legally marry. Sure, I can go to Maryland or any one of the small handful of U.S. states that currently allow equal marriage. Trouble is, I&#039;d have to live in those states for the rest of my life to enjoy any of the status that goes with that marriage. And, realistically, why should I be forced to do that when my heterosexual counterparts don&#039;t have to?

Yes, it may take a few years for this to reach the Supreme Court, but I have no reservation in believing that it will. It has to. Because, until somebody official steps in and brings these backwards states to task for what they&#039;ve done, we are NEVER going to see change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, until SCOTUS does enter this &#8220;mine field in the culture wars,&#8221; individual states are going to continue doing precisely what they have been doing all along; allowing the rights of their citizens to be placed on a public ballot.</p>
<p>I, for one, am sick to death of that whole thing. At the rate we&#8217;re rate, I&#8217;m going to be an 80 year old man before I&#8217;m finally able to legally marry. Sure, I can go to Maryland or any one of the small handful of U.S. states that currently allow equal marriage. Trouble is, I&#8217;d have to live in those states for the rest of my life to enjoy any of the status that goes with that marriage. And, realistically, why should I be forced to do that when my heterosexual counterparts don&#8217;t have to?</p>
<p>Yes, it may take a few years for this to reach the Supreme Court, but I have no reservation in believing that it will. It has to. Because, until somebody official steps in and brings these backwards states to task for what they&#8217;ve done, we are NEVER going to see change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary47</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/06/17/prop-8-case-wraps-up-ruling-expected-in-weeks/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>gary47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=8931#comment-1876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This case will never reach SCOTUS.  It takes 3-4 years for an appeal to get there, and the voters in California will almost certainly repeal prop 8 before then.

The justices do not want to enter a mine field in the culture wars.  This case will be kicked out as moot the day after the 2012 election.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case will never reach SCOTUS.  It takes 3-4 years for an appeal to get there, and the voters in California will almost certainly repeal prop 8 before then.</p>
<p>The justices do not want to enter a mine field in the culture wars.  This case will be kicked out as moot the day after the 2012 election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Prop 8 case wraps up, ruling expected in weeks</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/06/17/prop-8-case-wraps-up-ruling-expected-in-weeks/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Prop 8 case wraps up, ruling expected in weeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=8931#comment-1875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Washington Blade (&#8220;lgbtq community news source&#8221;): &#8220;In a statement, Jim Campbell, an attorney for Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal firm working on the case, said defendants would emphasize arguments they made throughout the trial. &#8216;The team of attorneys defending Proposition 8 will highlight all the reasons why Proposition 8 is constitutional,&#8217; he said. &#8216;In doing so, they will emphasize the reasons why Proposition 8 is not only rational, but also why preserving marriage as one man and one woman is good social policy.&#8217;&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Washington Blade (&#8220;lgbtq community news source&#8221;): &#8220;In a statement, Jim Campbell, an attorney for Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal firm working on the case, said defendants would emphasize arguments they made throughout the trial. &#8216;The team of attorneys defending Proposition 8 will highlight all the reasons why Proposition 8 is constitutional,&#8217; he said. &#8216;In doing so, they will emphasize the reasons why Proposition 8 is not only rational, but also why preserving marriage as one man and one woman is good social policy.&#8217;&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/06/17/prop-8-case-wraps-up-ruling-expected-in-weeks/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=8931#comment-1874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will assuredly be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will assuredly be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2010/06/17/prop-8-case-wraps-up-ruling-expected-in-weeks/feed/ ) in 0.28955 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 11:52 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2013 at 12:52 am UTC -->