<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A fourth openly gay member of Congress?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/09/09/a-fourth-openly-gay-member-of-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/09/09/a-fourth-openly-gay-member-of-congress/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: wastingurvote</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/09/09/a-fourth-openly-gay-member-of-congress/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>wastingurvote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 03:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=11740#comment-3481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are going to loose the country to rightist if you continue your stance. Being gay is important in the US Congress and from what I read he&#039;s the best choice for RI. Please don&#039;t waste your vote and let a lesser named/quality candidate run against a strong Republican]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are going to loose the country to rightist if you continue your stance. Being gay is important in the US Congress and from what I read he&#8217;s the best choice for RI. Please don&#8217;t waste your vote and let a lesser named/quality candidate run against a strong Republican</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/09/09/a-fourth-openly-gay-member-of-congress/#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator>jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=11740#comment-3457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just because a candidate shares some attribute with me does not mean that they&#039;re more likely to be better in office for my needs or interests. I voted for Cicilline twice, but you must remember that he first ran in the wake of Operation Plunderdome, a federal corruption investigation that made national headlines. We all wanted a new start. And last time around, the pickings were very slim.

Being gay doesn&#039;t make Cicilline a better candidate for Congress, for the gay community or anyone else. I have voted against gay candidates before, and I will again, when and where it makes sense.

A big part of Rhode Island&#039;s problems come from the habit of Rhode Islanders voting for people they feel are like them in some way -- Irish, Italian, Hispanic, gay, Catholic, whatever. None of these attributes in themselves recommend any candidate over any other. Yes, Cicilline would likely be stronger on gay issues than other candidates. But that doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;d be a better congressman overall. I don&#039;t believe he would be, and I intend to vote against him in the primary.

Should he win the primary, I would likely vote for him in the general election, as a better alternative to the other candidates we&#039;ve seen, but that is unrelated to his being gay. I don&#039;t vote for someone just because they&#039;re gay, but only if I truly believe they&#039;re the best candidate compared to all others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because a candidate shares some attribute with me does not mean that they&#8217;re more likely to be better in office for my needs or interests. I voted for Cicilline twice, but you must remember that he first ran in the wake of Operation Plunderdome, a federal corruption investigation that made national headlines. We all wanted a new start. And last time around, the pickings were very slim.</p>
<p>Being gay doesn&#8217;t make Cicilline a better candidate for Congress, for the gay community or anyone else. I have voted against gay candidates before, and I will again, when and where it makes sense.</p>
<p>A big part of Rhode Island&#8217;s problems come from the habit of Rhode Islanders voting for people they feel are like them in some way &#8212; Irish, Italian, Hispanic, gay, Catholic, whatever. None of these attributes in themselves recommend any candidate over any other. Yes, Cicilline would likely be stronger on gay issues than other candidates. But that doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;d be a better congressman overall. I don&#8217;t believe he would be, and I intend to vote against him in the primary.</p>
<p>Should he win the primary, I would likely vote for him in the general election, as a better alternative to the other candidates we&#8217;ve seen, but that is unrelated to his being gay. I don&#8217;t vote for someone just because they&#8217;re gay, but only if I truly believe they&#8217;re the best candidate compared to all others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2010/09/09/a-fourth-openly-gay-member-of-congress/feed/ ) in 0.29651 seconds, on Jun 20th, 2013 at 10:04 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jun 20th, 2013 at 11:04 am UTC -->