<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jackson petitions Supreme Court in D.C. marriage case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:14:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeeter Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6317</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeeter Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bishop Jackson&#039;s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court should be rejected by the justices on the grounds that Jackson lacks legal standing to file an appeal on a purely local issue.

Since Congress did not see fit to overturn the D.C. marriage statute -- and Congress has the last word on D.C. laws --  it is not up to the Supreme Court to decide the matter in the absence of any argument that the law is unconstitutional.

Moreover, Bishop Jackson&#039;s fight against the law is a thinly-disguised attempt to impose a &quot;religious test&quot; on the marriage law and force the D.C. government to endorse religious approbations against homosexuality by barring gay and lesbian couples from partaking in their constitutionally protected right to marry, a right firmly established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1967 when it struck down laws that barred interracial couples from marrying.

Gay and lesbian couples earned the right to marry when the high court struck down the last remaining anti-sodomy laws in 2003 (Lawrence v. Texas), fully decriminalizing gay and lesbian relationships. Combined with the high court&#039;s 1996 decision (Romer v. Evans) that states cannot single out gays and lesbians for exclusion from the constitutionally protected rights and freedoms enjoyed by everyone else, there is, therefore, no legal justification whatsoever to take the right to marry away from gay and lesbian couples in the nation&#039;s capital -- or anywhere else in the United States.

Dismiss Bishop Jackson&#039;s appeal!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bishop Jackson&#8217;s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court should be rejected by the justices on the grounds that Jackson lacks legal standing to file an appeal on a purely local issue.</p>
<p>Since Congress did not see fit to overturn the D.C. marriage statute &#8212; and Congress has the last word on D.C. laws &#8212;  it is not up to the Supreme Court to decide the matter in the absence of any argument that the law is unconstitutional.</p>
<p>Moreover, Bishop Jackson&#8217;s fight against the law is a thinly-disguised attempt to impose a &#8220;religious test&#8221; on the marriage law and force the D.C. government to endorse religious approbations against homosexuality by barring gay and lesbian couples from partaking in their constitutionally protected right to marry, a right firmly established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1967 when it struck down laws that barred interracial couples from marrying.</p>
<p>Gay and lesbian couples earned the right to marry when the high court struck down the last remaining anti-sodomy laws in 2003 (Lawrence v. Texas), fully decriminalizing gay and lesbian relationships. Combined with the high court&#8217;s 1996 decision (Romer v. Evans) that states cannot single out gays and lesbians for exclusion from the constitutionally protected rights and freedoms enjoyed by everyone else, there is, therefore, no legal justification whatsoever to take the right to marry away from gay and lesbian couples in the nation&#8217;s capital &#8212; or anywhere else in the United States.</p>
<p>Dismiss Bishop Jackson&#8217;s appeal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6223</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t the silence of dclive and Ben amazing when they are needed to stand up to a bigot?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the silence of dclive and Ben amazing when they are needed to stand up to a bigot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6186</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Robbie&quot;&gt;
&lt;cite&gt;Robbie&lt;/cite&gt;
Bishop Harry Jackson and Eddie Long are two of a kind.


&lt;a href=&quot;show_translate_popup(&#039;en&#039;, &#039;comment&#039;, 6185);&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[Translate]&lt;/A&gt; Comment awaiting moderation.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Robbie"><p>
<cite>Robbie</cite><br />
Bishop Harry Jackson and Eddie Long are two of a kind.</p>
<p><a href="show_translate_popup('en', 'comment', 6185);" rel="nofollow">[Translate]</a> Comment awaiting moderation.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6185</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bishop Harry Jackson and Eddie Long are two of a kind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bishop Harry Jackson and Eddie Long are two of a kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6184</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another Bishop Eddie Long.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Bishop Eddie Long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: customartist</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6176</link>
		<dc:creator>customartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can we see copies of the legal papers?

What is Bishop Harry Jackson&#039;s address in DC?

What are the other filers addresses?

Is Jackson using Church funds to file this Motion?

Hope Christian Church World Headquarters
6251 Ammendale Road
Beltsville, MD 20705

info@thehopeconnection.org

Phone: 240-845-0388]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we see copies of the legal papers?</p>
<p>What is Bishop Harry Jackson&#8217;s address in DC?</p>
<p>What are the other filers addresses?</p>
<p>Is Jackson using Church funds to file this Motion?</p>
<p>Hope Christian Church World Headquarters<br />
6251 Ammendale Road<br />
Beltsville, MD 20705</p>
<p><a href="mailto:info@thehopeconnection.org">info@thehopeconnection.org</a></p>
<p>Phone: 240-845-0388</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: customartist</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6175</link>
		<dc:creator>customartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s send the Mayor and City Council a note:


eom@dc.gov, dccouncil@dccouncil.us 


Dear City of DC Mayor Adrian Fenty, Council Members, and Chairman Gray,

As you probably know, Bishop Harry Jackson has filed motion with the Supreme Court challenging the right of LGBT citizens to marry legally in the City of DC.

DC LGBT Citizens now look to you for your continued protection in preserving the Rights of LGBT Citizens to Marry Legally within the City of DC, and that you now stand by your commitments by Filing Briefs in an effective manner with the Supreme Court in support of the current and newly enacted DC City Law.

Please do not stand idly by while both Our Rights and Your Hard Work might be swept away.

Sincerely,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s send the Mayor and City Council a note:</p>
<p><a href="mailto:eom@dc.gov">eom@dc.gov</a>, <a href="mailto:dccouncil@dccouncil.us">dccouncil@dccouncil.us</a> </p>
<p>Dear City of DC Mayor Adrian Fenty, Council Members, and Chairman Gray,</p>
<p>As you probably know, Bishop Harry Jackson has filed motion with the Supreme Court challenging the right of LGBT citizens to marry legally in the City of DC.</p>
<p>DC LGBT Citizens now look to you for your continued protection in preserving the Rights of LGBT Citizens to Marry Legally within the City of DC, and that you now stand by your commitments by Filing Briefs in an effective manner with the Supreme Court in support of the current and newly enacted DC City Law.</p>
<p>Please do not stand idly by while both Our Rights and Your Hard Work might be swept away.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6148</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ equal and Jerry, I like your thinking.  Also, it amazes me that these black ministers are so strident in attacking the rights of GLBT folk.  You&#039;d think with all of the problems in their own community, they&#039;d be busy until the Rapture.  

If he (and his ilk) really cared about families -- then they would target some real causes for the failure of families.  The fact is that 50% of marriages end up in divorce.  Of course, these are heterosexual marriages since that’s the only kind available!  Further, kids are increasing being born to single women. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics for 2007 (the latest year of recorded data) 40% of children in the U.S. are born to single women, this is a blended number.  The breakdown is: 28% to white women; 51% of Latinas; and 72% to Black women.   Again, 72% are born to SINGLE BLACK WOMEN.  But for bigot Jackson and his ilk, it&#039;s just so much easier to argue a red herring than to address the real issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ equal and Jerry, I like your thinking.  Also, it amazes me that these black ministers are so strident in attacking the rights of GLBT folk.  You&#8217;d think with all of the problems in their own community, they&#8217;d be busy until the Rapture.  </p>
<p>If he (and his ilk) really cared about families &#8212; then they would target some real causes for the failure of families.  The fact is that 50% of marriages end up in divorce.  Of course, these are heterosexual marriages since that’s the only kind available!  Further, kids are increasing being born to single women. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics for 2007 (the latest year of recorded data) 40% of children in the U.S. are born to single women, this is a blended number.  The breakdown is: 28% to white women; 51% of Latinas; and 72% to Black women.   Again, 72% are born to SINGLE BLACK WOMEN.  But for bigot Jackson and his ilk, it&#8217;s just so much easier to argue a red herring than to address the real issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the court agrees with the concept that material harm has to be present to hear this request, then I don&#039;t thing Bigot Harry Jackass has a hope in hell of getting his way.  That has never stopped bigots elsewhere from screaming for attention like spoiled children always do. 

I also want some assurances that Bigot Harry Jackass is actually a citizen of the District of Columbia.  I want official confirmation that he is paying income taxes to the city.  While his income may be derived outside the city he&#039;s still required to pay taxes to the city if he is a resident of the city and is registered to vote.

If he is only a part time resident and maintains a voting residence in another jurisdiction, he lacks standing to challenge any city ordinance.

If he is registered to vote in the District and is not paying taxes, I believe that would constitute fraud which would subject him to criminal prosecution and a stint in jail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the court agrees with the concept that material harm has to be present to hear this request, then I don&#8217;t thing Bigot Harry Jackass has a hope in hell of getting his way.  That has never stopped bigots elsewhere from screaming for attention like spoiled children always do. </p>
<p>I also want some assurances that Bigot Harry Jackass is actually a citizen of the District of Columbia.  I want official confirmation that he is paying income taxes to the city.  While his income may be derived outside the city he&#8217;s still required to pay taxes to the city if he is a resident of the city and is registered to vote.</p>
<p>If he is only a part time resident and maintains a voting residence in another jurisdiction, he lacks standing to challenge any city ordinance.</p>
<p>If he is registered to vote in the District and is not paying taxes, I believe that would constitute fraud which would subject him to criminal prosecution and a stint in jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: equal</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/#comment-6114</link>
		<dc:creator>equal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=13701#comment-6114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court has declared marriage to be a &quot;basic civil rights of man,&quot;. They have also said: &quot;The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One&#039;s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.&quot;
 
The 14th amendment says no state shall &quot;deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.&quot; The Equal Protection Clause “neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Supreme Court has declared marriage to be a &#8220;basic civil rights of man,&#8221;. They have also said: &#8220;The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One&#8217;s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.&#8221;</p>
<p>The 14th amendment says no state shall &#8220;deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.&#8221; The Equal Protection Clause “neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2010/10/18/jackson-petitions-supreme-court-in-d-c-marriage-case/feed/ ) in 0.27501 seconds, on May 25th, 2013 at 12:29 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 25th, 2013 at 1:29 am UTC -->