October 21, 2010 | by Adam Bink
It gets better — except with GOProud

GOProud, a group that claims to “represent gay conservatives and their allies,” has certainly tried their best to stir the pot. First came their opposition to the candidacy of Palm Springs Mayor Steve Pougnet, who would be the first openly gay married dad elected to Congress. Then came their support for the anti-equality challenger to Rep. Barney Frank. These moves didn’t surprise me, as I always considered GOProud to be an arm of the Tea Party, just with gay staffers. They’re obsessed with worshipping at the altar of free-market conservatism, but without a coherent strategy to win equality for LGBT Americans.

But then came their invitation to Ann Coulter to appear at their “Homocon” convention in late September. Yes, the same Ann Coulter who said sexually active gay men should “feel guilty about it,” and “once [scientists] find the gay gene, guess who’s getting aborted?” She showed up in fine form. While referring to the freedom to marry for same-sex couples, she said, “it’s not a civil right. You’re not black,” and that the ideal for raising children is “a mother and a father.”

Here’s the part that gets me: not only was Coulter invited, but the attendees laughed at her jokes. GOProud paid her for her hate speech. They actually defended it, too. GOProud Board Chair Chris Barron said Coulter “was exactly who we thought she was when we invited her. Ann is someone who we disagree with on issues like marriage, but is also one of the funniest, most provocative, and — yes — controversial conservatives out there.” He went on to tell the New York Times, “it’s a branding opportunity.” What are they branding themselves as? The only organization that hosts mixers for self-loathing gays?

Worse, Coulter’s appearance came in the middle of a series of gay teens tragically taking their own lives — bullied because of hate speech from people like Coulter, who has millions upon millions of followers. She’s one of the best-selling authors in the country and appears regularly on television and radio. Coulter didn’t just speak to a room full of people paying $2,500 to hear her spew homophobia-fueling hate speech — what she said broadcasted out on the airwaves. It probably didn’t occur to Barron and GOProud that these fans might actually know gay people, or even have closeted gay children. But that’s OK, because she’s funny and provocative, right?

Then, an even odder thing happened. New York Republican gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino got himself into hot water, saying children shouldn’t be “brainwashed into thinking that homosexuality is an equally valid or successful option.” And to my surprise, GOProud actually criticized him. Barron, whose acerbic Twitter tongue has sometimes gotten him into trouble, tweeted “Moral judgments from Carl Paladino, the NY version of John Edwards, should be ignored.” Pretty ironic, considering that Ann Coulter once called John Edwards a “faggot” (a fact conveniently ignored by Barron).

What I have trouble understanding is what the difference is between Carl Paladino and Ann Coulter. Oh, wait, I know. To GOProud, one is a homophobe, while the other isn’t because she raised money for GOProud.

Hey, maybe they’re more interested in branding and cocktail parties than worrying about the consequences. After all, it was Barron who said of Coulter, “We could not think of anyone who we would want to party with more.” He likes to talk about his delight in pissing off the “gay left.” It’s all in good fun for GOProud and Barron, because they got $2,500 a head. The rest of us got more people teaching their kids to bully other kids because they’re gay.

I’ve got news for Chris: this isn’t a gay “left” or “right” issue. If gay people pay for and promote this behavior, there is no reason Coulter or Paladino should ever change. And it gets harder to change the minds of those who listen to them.

This past month’s tragic events have presented an opportunity. Thanks to the hard work of Dan Savage, supportive allies and perhaps you, we’re making headway in communicating “It Gets Better” to troubled LGBT youth.

The problem is, with GOProud on the loose, it gets worse.

7 Comments
  • GOProud is made up of individuals who are proud of who they are. So is the KKK. There is at least one difference. Those in the KKK know how to hide when it looks like society might stomp on them. Those in GOProud make me think of the Jews in Germany in the 1930s who thought they were safe.

    • I too am baffled that people who seek tolerance and acceptance for who and what they are turn right around and berate and demand conformity from others in their fold. If they don’t center their lives around their sexual orientation as the activists want, they’re “self-loathing.” And here I thought we all wanted to be free to live as we please. Silly me.

  • Unfortunate that those who pull themselves from the gay victimhood mire become villainized by the same people preaching tolerance, diversity and acceptance.

  • Ann Coulter stated “when tehy find the gay gene, guess whose getting aborted?” to advocate a pro-life stance, shared by many concerned gay and bisexual individuals (that parents will choose to have gay/bi babies aborted).

    Other gay conservatives like Coulter because they see a potential future ally–I’m not sure I agree. She seems to view herself as a “centrist” between social conservatives and gay conservatives (halfway between center-right and far-right) and I’m not sure that is a viable political strategy.

    @Jerry: Not all conservatives are “conservative” in a traditional sense. These days there are libertarians, classical liberals, and even 1960s center-left civil libertarians in the conservative movement–to such a great extent there may very well be more classically liberal or libertarian “conservatives” then fascist or social ones. Nowadays there are debates on what exactly we should be conserving. :)

    Reforming the social conservatives brings us a lot of joy–watching them grow out of their biases and programming is a wonderful process. Simply writing them off as bigots is ignoring their humanity.

    I imagine you’ve had similar personal experiences with the far right as I’ve had with the far left. Neither side is correct. My family had extremely nasty experiences with the far left–and I’ve said much the same things you yourself have about the left.

    I understand how horrifying the other “side” can look, but each has a wide range of factions and a great many intolerant, bigoted groups.

  • Personally, I think Ann Coulter is a closet case of a different kind: A vicious, venom-spewing male chauvinist pig who, despite having had gender-reassignment surgery, is STILL a male chauvinist pig.

    And as we all know, male chauvinist pigs are the worst kind of homophobes.

  • While I am not a fan of Ann Coulter, I hold the gay establishment in equal disdain. Both are self-promoting.

    I read the worried comment about a group supporting Barney Franks opponent. I do not have a dog in that fight, but will say I have cringed each time Barney’s embarrassing behavior has been brought up.

    Economically illiterate Obama also opposes gay marriage & is appealing the DOMA ruling. Shall we run enmasse to embrace his opponent?

    The guy is an embarrassment to the community. One husband busted for a prostitution business, one working on bogus mortgage products at Freddie Mac, and another growing pot in his backyard.

    Yeah, lets all run to his defense.

    Our community is made up of individuals. Only fools buy into group-think, and tow the line.

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.
Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin