- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-

Leahy withholds amendments for gay couples in immigration bill
-

Tensions high as Senate panel considers immigration reform
-

U.K. House of Commons approves marriage bill
-

Gay DC psychiatrist named head of APA
-

Gay judicial nominee confirmed to Oregon federal court
-

Capital Trans Pride
-

Sally Ride to receive Presidential Medal of Freedom
Winning in politics is a two-party fight
The witching hour is upon us. I’m not talking about Halloween, but the event that occurs just 48 hours later — Election Day. With mere days to go, the political map has nearly 100 Democratic seats in play, with the Republican Party poised to retake the House of Representatives, according to most pundits and prognosticators.
To my LGBT family, sorry to say this, but “I told you so.” While some groups have said that we need to be patient with this White House and this Congress, time is quickly running out.
To my Republican brothers and sisters, it is time to start talking about what we stand for. It is no longer OK to only be against everything.
Weeks ago, Larry Sabato of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, forecasted that the House would flip to the GOP after Nov. 2. He went further by saying that the Senate could see a 50-50 split.
Back in January on these pages, I asked, “What is there to show for the progress of the LGBT movement under Democratic control?” I fear the answer to this question today is the same as it was nine months ago: not much.
While many within our community continue to blindly mock and ridicule gay Republicans as being self-loathing, among other hollow insults, they simultaneously refuse to see that strength through diversity means just that – diversity in everything, including political thought.
This diversity in thought led conservative icon Ted Olsen to craft a conservative constitutional argument in the Prop 8 case in California. And most recently, it is the Log Cabin Republicans, who six years ago during the Bush administration brought a suit against the military that two weeks ago halted all discharges worldwide under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” It is Republicans who are winning the argument for equal rights for gays and lesbians.
And while it is very true that the GOP has a dismal record on LGBT issues, Republican leaders are engaging gays and lesbians on issues where we at least have common ground.
Last month, the chairmen of the National Republican Congressional Committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee spoke at the National Dinner for the Log Cabin Republicans. They did so despite the protests of several conservative groups that asked them to withdraw.
No, their records on traditional LGBT issues aren’t stellar in the least. However, they are engaging us on issues where we can come together. While the Defense of Marriage Act, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and “Don’t Ask” are at the forefront of our movement, there are other issues that we can and should talk about, such as immigration reform and taxes, just to name two.
The outcome of this mid-term election will produce many things. It will produce heartache, malaise and distrust. But I also hope it will produce a sense of working with both political parties. This can be done by helping to elect more gay and gay-friendly Republican candidates. There are more than a dozen endorsed by the Log Cabin Republicans. Locally, all four Republican D.C. City Council candidates are gay-friendly. And two of them, Marc Morgan (Ward 1) and Tim Day (Ward 5) are gay Republicans.
Even before the holy war attacks on marriage equality during the Bush years, there weren’t many groups willing to work with the GOP on our issues. I hope the last two years of total Democratic control will show these groups that they cannot afford to make that same mistake again. We need to engage both parties, and change hearts and minds one person at a time. If we don’t, we’ll get another Democratic speaker under a Democratic president telling us “not now.”
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.



view print edition
Just one republican senator was needed to join the democrats in repeal of DADT, but while the dems brought it to a vote, every single republican voted against it. Yes we need for them to overcome their prejudice, but we shouldn’t allow them in positions where they can hurt us before they prove they have overcome their prejudice.
[Translate]
Equal – I both appreciate and respect your thoughtful response. Thanks!
[Translate]
This is the most thoughtful and intellectually honest article I have ever read in my journalistic career of following the GLBT press. No doubt many Gays will vote Republican this year. The New York Times polling of self-identifying Gays estimates as many as 1-1.25 million Gay voters will go for the GOP.
[Translate]
You should explain us how we can work with people like goproud. The log cabin republicans are at least a gay rights association but goproud has endorsed anti gay politicians. an antigay politician is for example that candidate in massachusset that explained that dadt is a right law because also short people can’t enlist in the army and they don’t make protests. the support of dadt is bad ,but the patently homophobic motive given is worse. But goproud supporters do not care because they live in liberal states or big cities where the so contempted Gay ,inc has won civil unions ,marriage rights or anti discrimination laws. If you are not happy with the democratic party rule and you are gay you can vote the libertarian party (if you are pro-free market) or green party if you like the welfare state.
[Translate]