- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
Supreme Court continues ‘Don’t Ask’ enforcement
The U.S. Supreme Court is allowing the Defense Department to continue enforcement of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” as an appellate court considers litigation challenging the military’s gay ban.
According to the Supreme Court’s two-paragraph order, the justices’ decision to uphold a stay against an injunction prohibiting enforcement of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” was considered by the full court, but U.S. Associate Justice Elena Kagan, who called the military’s gay ban “unjust” during her confirmation hearings, recused herself.
The order comes after Log Cabin Republicans, the organization responsible for the lawsuit, last week asked the Supreme Court to lift a stay on a district court-issued injunction prohibiting enforcement of the 1993 law. The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued the stay after the Obama administration appealed the case to the court.
Log Cabin’s application vacate to stay was sent to U.S. Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, the circuit justice for the Ninth Circuit, who could have made the decision on his own.
Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Virginia Phillips issued the injunction that would enjoined enforcement of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” after she ruled in September that the law is unconstitutional.
In a statement, R. Clarke Cooper, executive director of Log Cabin Republicans, said his organization is “disappointed” the Supreme Court affirmed the stay but is “not surprised.”
“We are committed to pursuing every avenue in the fight against this failed and unconstitutional policy,” Cooper said. “Log Cabin will continue working to secure the votes needed for legislative repeal, and if necessary, we look forward to seeing President Obama’s attorneys in court next year to prove, once again, that ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ doesn’t work.”
Alex Nicholson, executive director of Servicemembers United and sole named plaintiff in the lawsuit, called the Supreme Court’s decision to allow for continued enforcement of the military’s gay ban “unfortunate.”
“This just underscores the need to continue to put pressure on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to allow the defense authorization bill to come back up and take its first procedural step before the Senate’s Thanksgiving recess,” Nicholson said.
Download a copy of the Supreme Court’s decision here.
Tagged with Alex Nicholson, Don't Ask Don't Tell, Elena Kagan, Log Cabin Republicans, Log Cabin v. United States, R. Clarke Cooper, Servicemembers United, U.S. Supreme Court
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.

view print edition
Since Sotomayor recused herself in the DADT Stay, will Scalia do the same in cases bearing topics that he continually comments on?
[Translate]
It wasn’t Justice Sotomayor. it was Justice Kagan who recused herself
[Translate]
I’m not entirely surprised that Justice Elena Kagan recused herself from the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell case. It’s one of several cases that the Supreme Court will deal with in its current term that Justice Kagan will be required to recuse herself from, because of her previous role as Solicitor General in handling the cases.
In the particular case of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Kagan’s public statement during her confirmation hearing that she considered the policy “unjust” left her with no choice but to recuse herself under the U.S. Code of Judicial Conduct, which requires federal judges to recuse themselves from cases in which the judge either has a vested personal interest, or has stated a firm public position that would make it impossible for that judge to be impartial in that case.
[Translate]
I don’t agree with Kagan recusing herself. Thurgood Marshall didin’t recuse himself regarding race-related cases.
[Translate]