<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court continues &#8216;Don&#8217;t Ask&#8217; enforcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/11/12/supreme-court-permits-continued-dont-ask-enforcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/11/12/supreme-court-permits-continued-dont-ask-enforcement/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/11/12/supreme-court-permits-continued-dont-ask-enforcement/#comment-8226</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 19:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=14627#comment-8226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t agree with Kagan recusing herself.  Thurgood Marshall didin&#039;t recuse himself regarding race-related cases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with Kagan recusing herself.  Thurgood Marshall didin&#8217;t recuse himself regarding race-related cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sketer Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/11/12/supreme-court-permits-continued-dont-ask-enforcement/#comment-8215</link>
		<dc:creator>Sketer Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=14627#comment-8215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#039;t Justice Sotomayor. it was Justice Kagan who recused herself]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t Justice Sotomayor. it was Justice Kagan who recused herself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sketer Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/11/12/supreme-court-permits-continued-dont-ask-enforcement/#comment-8214</link>
		<dc:creator>Sketer Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=14627#comment-8214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not entirely surprised that Justice Elena Kagan recused herself from the Don&#039;t Ask, Don&#039;t Tell case. It&#039;s one of several cases that the Supreme Court will deal with in its current term that Justice Kagan will be required to recuse herself from, because of her previous role as Solicitor General in handling the cases. 

In the particular case of Don&#039;t Ask, Don&#039;t Tell, Kagan&#039;s public statement during her confirmation hearing that she considered the policy &quot;unjust&quot; left her with no choice but to recuse herself under the U.S. Code of Judicial Conduct, which requires federal judges to recuse themselves from cases in which the judge either has a vested personal interest, or has stated a firm public position that would make it impossible for that judge to be impartial in that case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not entirely surprised that Justice Elena Kagan recused herself from the Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell case. It&#8217;s one of several cases that the Supreme Court will deal with in its current term that Justice Kagan will be required to recuse herself from, because of her previous role as Solicitor General in handling the cases. </p>
<p>In the particular case of Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell, Kagan&#8217;s public statement during her confirmation hearing that she considered the policy &#8220;unjust&#8221; left her with no choice but to recuse herself under the U.S. Code of Judicial Conduct, which requires federal judges to recuse themselves from cases in which the judge either has a vested personal interest, or has stated a firm public position that would make it impossible for that judge to be impartial in that case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: customartist</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/11/12/supreme-court-permits-continued-dont-ask-enforcement/#comment-8211</link>
		<dc:creator>customartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=14627#comment-8211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Sotomayor recused herself in the DADT Stay, will Scalia do the same in cases bearing topics that he continually comments on?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Sotomayor recused herself in the DADT Stay, will Scalia do the same in cases bearing topics that he continually comments on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2010/11/12/supreme-court-permits-continued-dont-ask-enforcement/feed/ ) in 0.25889 seconds, on Jun 19th, 2013 at 5:59 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jun 19th, 2013 at 6:59 pm UTC -->