D.C. AIDS orgs face $427,000 in cuts

By on December 6, 2010

The D.C. City Council is scheduled to vote Tuesday on a budget-slashing proposal submitted last month by Mayor Adrian Fenty that includes $427,000 in proposed cuts in city funding for community-based AIDS organizations, including the Whitman-Walker Clinic.

Fenty submitted his proposal to the Council in response to a projected $188 million budget shortfall the city is facing for fiscal year 2011. Nearly all other city agencies and departments are also slated for budget cuts under the Fenty proposal.

Mayor-elect Vincent Gray, the current City Council chair, is expected to take a leading role in addressing the budget issue, including possible amendments to reduce the cuts, at Tuesday’s City Council meeting set to begin at 10 a.m. Gray takes office as mayor on Jan. 2.

“We are aware of at least two cuts that will impact our programs,” said Don Blanchon, Whitman-Walker Clinic’s executive director. “We are also aware of the economic hard times that the city is faced with, and we will find a way to work through this.”

Blanchon said the Clinic learned that one of the cuts targets city-funded HIV testing and counseling programs carried out by community-based groups like Whitman-Walker. He said the Fenty proposal includes a 10 percent across-the-board cut in all city-funded testing and counseling programs. Thus the $145,000 grant the clinic now receives for HIV testing would likely be reduced by $14,500 to $130,500, a clinic spokesperson said.

According to Blanchon, the Clinic would receive another cut in city funds for legal services programs at its Max Robinson Clinic in Anacostia, which received $144,500 from the city for 2010. He said the size of that cut could not be immediately determined.

Ron Simmons, executive director of Us Helping Us, a community-based group that provides HIV-related services to black gay men, said his group also receives city funding for HIV testing and counseling. He said the group would likely be hit by the same cuts that Whitman-Walker is slated to receive for HIV testing services.

Simmons and Blanchon noted that the overwhelming majority of funding for the city’s AIDS programs comes from the federal government through the federal Ryan White CARE Act. The two said the city doesn’t have authority to cut funding from federal grants and contracts, a development that protects Us Helping Us and Whitman-Walker from cuts in the bulk of its government funded programs.

D.C. Council member David Catania (I-At-Large), who chairs the Council’s Committee on Health, could not be immediately reached to determine if he or other Council members plan on contesting Fenty’s proposed cuts in city-funded AIDS programs.

A local social services advocacy group, Empower D.C., was scheduled to hold a protest outside the John Wilson City Hall Building, where the Council is located, at 9 a.m. Tuesday. Spokesperson Ben Parisi said members of the coalition are calling on the Council to reject most of Fenty’s proposed cuts for social services programs and to address the city’s budget shortfall through a “modest” income tax increase for people who earn more than $200,000 a year.

Filed under health, local news. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Tagged with Adrian Fenty, D.C. City Council, Don Blanchon, Vincent Gray, Whitman-Walker Clinic

We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.

Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.

Comments
  • Peter Rosenstein December 7, 2010 at 4:10 pm

    The District has to take a zero based budgeting approach to the dire budget situation we are in now. I think that the Council needs to impose cuts now and then look at the budget as a whole and determine what additional cuts can be made and make them and then determine if a tax increase is needed.

    It is too simplistic to always say tax those with higher incomes without making the necessary cuts in programs first. I for one don’t mind paying additional taxes. But I want to be absolutely sure that when I do they are going to fund crucial government programs and not paying for programs that can be or should be cut, or where belts can be tightened without hurting people first. I am not convinced that is the case yet in the DC budget.

    For the past four years we have been spending above our means without a thought to the future. Buiding recreation centers and libraries, that while we want them, we now don’t have the money to keep them open or staffed.

    Well now the time has come to face the piper and we need to do this carefully not at the last minute with the easy cry “just raise taxes”.

Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin