<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prop 8 sent to Calif. Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/04/appeals-court-seeks-guidance-in-calif-marriage-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/04/appeals-court-seeks-guidance-in-calif-marriage-case/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: customartist</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/04/appeals-court-seeks-guidance-in-calif-marriage-case/#comment-12052</link>
		<dc:creator>customartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=16430#comment-12052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would there be a higher standard for proving standing for the Appellate Court than there was for the Lower Court?  

If the Proponents had standing to bring the suit originally, then why wouldn&#039;t they have equal standing to appeal the rezulting ruling?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would there be a higher standard for proving standing for the Appellate Court than there was for the Lower Court?  </p>
<p>If the Proponents had standing to bring the suit originally, then why wouldn&#8217;t they have equal standing to appeal the rezulting ruling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/04/appeals-court-seeks-guidance-in-calif-marriage-case/#comment-12045</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 04:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=16430#comment-12045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...gay rights attorneys challenging the ballot measure on appeal argued that only the state could defend the measure because it was a state law.&quot; To be clear, Olson and Boies are arguing that Proponents cannot appeal, not that they couldn&#039;t defend the law at all. Proponents have already defended the law and lost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;gay rights attorneys challenging the ballot measure on appeal argued that only the state could defend the measure because it was a state law.&#8221; To be clear, Olson and Boies are arguing that Proponents cannot appeal, not that they couldn&#8217;t defend the law at all. Proponents have already defended the law and lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/04/appeals-court-seeks-guidance-in-calif-marriage-case/feed/ ) in 0.24084 seconds, on May 19th, 2013 at 10:43 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2013 at 11:43 am UTC -->