<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gates working to implement ‘Don’t Ask’ repeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/06/gates-working-to-implement-%E2%80%98don%E2%80%99t-ask%E2%80%99-repeal-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/06/gates-working-to-implement-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99-repeal-2/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:09:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/06/gates-working-to-implement-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99-repeal-2/#comment-12195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 18:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=16528#comment-12195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It used to be a law, now it is a policy, and I don&#039;t think it will survive congressional review. Republicans will obstruct it &quot;until our nation is at peace.&quot; Since we are always at war somewhere or the other, that means never.

The law was unconstitutional, the policy is only an end-run around it, but it s still unconstitutional. The only remedy is in the court system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be a law, now it is a policy, and I don&#8217;t think it will survive congressional review. Republicans will obstruct it &#8220;until our nation is at peace.&#8221; Since we are always at war somewhere or the other, that means never.</p>
<p>The law was unconstitutional, the policy is only an end-run around it, but it s still unconstitutional. The only remedy is in the court system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Dorado</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/06/gates-working-to-implement-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99-repeal-2/#comment-12165</link>
		<dc:creator>El Dorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=16528#comment-12165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That 60 day waiting period after certification for Congressional Review sounds like a place where delay in implementation can drag on. With the House fraught with the GOP in particular. 

If Gates waiting until &quot;all&quot; the chiefs are comfortable moving forward, it may never happen. You had better go for a majority and pressure them to get with it or just leave.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 60 day waiting period after certification for Congressional Review sounds like a place where delay in implementation can drag on. With the House fraught with the GOP in particular. </p>
<p>If Gates waiting until &#8220;all&#8221; the chiefs are comfortable moving forward, it may never happen. You had better go for a majority and pressure them to get with it or just leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deryk</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/06/gates-working-to-implement-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99-repeal-2/#comment-12154</link>
		<dc:creator>Deryk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=16528#comment-12154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What exactly does &#039;congressional review&#039; mean?  Only a few articles mention it, others simply say 60 days after certification.  Does that mean congress can disagree with it and send it back for recertification, and if so, is there a limit?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly does &#8216;congressional review&#8217; mean?  Only a few articles mention it, others simply say 60 days after certification.  Does that mean congress can disagree with it and send it back for recertification, and if so, is there a limit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/06/gates-working-to-implement-%e2%80%98don%e2%80%99t-ask%e2%80%99-repeal-2/#comment-12106</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=16528#comment-12106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is bullshit.  It took only four months to implement the integration of blacks, and one month for women.  This could go on for a year or even more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is bullshit.  It took only four months to implement the integration of blacks, and one month for women.  This could go on for a year or even more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/01/06/gates-working-to-implement-%E2%80%98don%E2%80%99t-ask%E2%80%99-repeal-2/feed/ ) in 0.43903 seconds, on May 23rd, 2013 at 3:52 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2013 at 4:52 pm UTC -->