- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
Giffords shooting shines light on guns, speech
Maybe the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) is the natural outgrowth of our country’s polarization, hyper-partisan climate and all of our hateful political speech. Or maybe we’re all reading too much into it and Jared Lee Loughner is simply a psychopath.
Regardless, the tragedy in Tucson has shone a bright light on our culture — from the way political adversaries demonize one another to our lax gun laws that enable psychopaths to walk into a big-box sporting goods store and buy 200 bullets at a time.
When news surfaced that Giffords was among 20 Democrats targeted by Sarah Palin on her web site — her congressional district depicted in the crosshairs of a gun — the predictable battle lines were drawn. Palin’s critics on the left rushed to blame her, while Fox News commentators turned the tables and said Loughner was a left-wing radical. They all missed the lesson of the tragedy.
Palin didn’t pull the trigger and isn’t directly to blame. But she needs to take responsibility for her dangerous rhetoric. The First Amendment doesn’t grant us freedom of speech free of consequences. A true leader — which Palin this week showed us she is not — would step forward, apologize for using such violent metaphors and work to change the ugly tone that permeates political debate in this country.
In moments of crisis, we drop our political affiliations and come together and it’s been gratifying to watch the interviews this week of the witnesses and first responders who ran toward the gunfire to help victims. From doctors who happened to be grocery shopping nearby and rushed to administer CPR, to a young man buying cigarettes who helped subdue the gunman, there were real moments of compassion and courage amid the tragedy.
Perhaps the person who stood out most in the chaos was Daniel Hernandez, a 20-year-old gay Hispanic-American intern who’d been working for Giffords for just five days. When most people would have run away from the gunfire, Hernandez instinctively sought out victims who needed medical attention.
He quickly assessed the scene and understood the severity of Giffords’s wound, thanks in part to his training as a certified nursing assistant. He realized that the congresswoman risked choking on her own blood, so he propped her up in his lap and applied pressure to the wound to slow the bleeding. Even after medical crews arrived, Hernandez stayed with Giffords.
“I saw my job then as not taking care of her medical needs but taking care of her emotional needs,” a poised and articulate Hernandez told the “Today” show. “I tried to comfort her and make sure she knew she wasn’t alone. I let her know I was going to try to contact her parents and her husband.”
Some have since questioned the significance of reporting on Hernandez’s sexual orientation, but it’s important for Americans to see LGBT people as a visible part of society and, yes, sometimes as heroes. In the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the compelling story of Mark Bingham, the gay rugby player who helped bring down United Airlines Flight 93 over Pennsylvania, captured headlines. Arizona Sen. John McCain, in a 2008 interview with the Blade, cited Bingham as one of his gay heroes. After Hernandez’s brave actions in Tucson, others will surely view him in the same light.
Tagged with Gabrielle Giffords, Sarah Palin
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.


view print edition
Hitler didn’t pull the trigger. He just set in motion and then supported the death of 55 million people.
Palin and the fundamentalist anything but christian christians are doing the same. the level of hatred is extreme. It poisons the well of civil discourse and gives license to the schizos and others like Lou???? or whatever the f.. his name is.
Someone said of Palin – dont discount this woman. He didn’t say in what way……
[Translate]