Comments on: Ugly testimony at Md. marriage hearing

By: susie Murphy

susie Murphy — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:10:42 +0000

It was the swales guy, whose t shirt said gays were worse then animals.
Surpring from a black preacher whose people were treated like animlals. Welcome tho to conservative religion. The curse of history, eg think 9-11

By: susie Murphy

susie Murphy — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:09:07 +0000

maggie supported traditional marriage by having not 1 but 2 illegitimate children.

kind of an analog to how the worst of the anti gay marriage people are secretly gay /

http://www.ranker.com/list/top-10-anti-gay-activists-caught-being-gay/joanne

By: Richard "Kap" Kaplowitz

Richard "Kap" Kaplowitz — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 03:43:13 +0000

I remarried 3 years ago, when I was 55 and my wife 59. We married for LOVE and are not able to nor want to procreate. If the only reason for marriage is procreation would NOM and the other haters want us to live “in sin” because while we can f–k we can’t produce kids??

By: Henri Lemonnier

Henri Lemonnier — Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:49:05 +0000

Following Maggie Galagher’s logic, if the only people who should marry are those who can procreate, then those past child bearing age and and those unable to bear children should also be banned from marrying. I don’t see her advocating for that. Could she just be a homophobe in sheep’s clothes?

By: Brian Summers

Brian Summers — Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:52:40 +0000

So, um, let me get this “straight.” Maggie actually believes that “if Maryland adopts this radical new view of marriage, it will have consequences.” What sort of consequences? Will heterosexual couples no longer be able to marry? Will their rights to life, love and the pursuit of happiness be infringed upon because two men or two women simply want to share in that long-held American Dream? This woman, like most bigots on the wrong side of this issue, has absolutely no credibility and should have nothing whatsoever to say about other people’s lives.

By: Steve

Steve — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:14:30 +0000

Someone did. It was predictable.

By: Doctor Whom

Doctor Whom — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:14:31 +0000

Their testimony has prompted one state senator to go from “no” to undecided. Keep up the good work, ‘phobes.

By: Syd Diamond

Syd Diamond — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:15:56 +0000

The good thing is that nobody brought up the “Adam and Steve” line. Progress.

By: Doctor Whom

Doctor Whom — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:57:02 +0000

It’s a recycling bin for thoroughly debunked arguments.

By: Tim

Tim — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:18:02 +0000

So who invited that witch Maggie Gallagher to fly in on her broomstick? And why does the rotten National Organization for Marriage (strait people only) always feel the need to butt into gay & lesbian people’s lives?