<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama still defending &#8216;Don&#8217;t Ask&#8217; in court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/02/26/obama-still-defending-dont-ask-in-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/02/26/obama-still-defending-dont-ask-in-court/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ascher</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/02/26/obama-still-defending-dont-ask-in-court/#comment-17826</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ascher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=18266#comment-17826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ongoing litigation over DADT would probably affect the repeal implementation process negatively. The government would have to hold opposing positions at once. Unfortunately, this is the way policy change works in our now-bureaucratic system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ongoing litigation over DADT would probably affect the repeal implementation process negatively. The government would have to hold opposing positions at once. Unfortunately, this is the way policy change works in our now-bureaucratic system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/02/26/obama-still-defending-dont-ask-in-court/#comment-17700</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=18266#comment-17700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is obvious to me the reason the Administration doesn&#039;t want the courts to declare DADT unconstitutional is the fact that all service members who have been removed from the military since DADT was implemented could argue they were victims of illegal discrimination at the hands of the US Govt and it Armed Services. That could have ripple effects for decades to come. Not to mention possible lawsuits for damages. I hope the court throws the book at DADT! I hope all the &quot;Victims&quot; of DADT have their day in court and win a hefty judgment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is obvious to me the reason the Administration doesn&#8217;t want the courts to declare DADT unconstitutional is the fact that all service members who have been removed from the military since DADT was implemented could argue they were victims of illegal discrimination at the hands of the US Govt and it Armed Services. That could have ripple effects for decades to come. Not to mention possible lawsuits for damages. I hope the court throws the book at DADT! I hope all the &#8220;Victims&#8221; of DADT have their day in court and win a hefty judgment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/02/26/obama-still-defending-dont-ask-in-court/feed/ ) in 0.50575 seconds, on May 25th, 2013 at 9:08 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 25th, 2013 at 10:08 am UTC -->