<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOMA repeal supporters seek Senate hearings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/03/23/doma-repeal-supporters-seek-senate-hearings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/03/23/doma-repeal-supporters-seek-senate-hearings/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoyt Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/03/23/doma-repeal-supporters-seek-senate-hearings/#comment-19323</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoyt Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=19199#comment-19323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also would be extremely happy for Maggie Gallagher to once again take it upon herself to act as U.S moral arbitrator, most ideally in televised hearings.  That way the entire country can watch Maggie continue to solidify her actual role as Chief Bigot, using her comical, hollow, false and unsubstantiated claims of why, in her own words &quot;It is not discrimination to treat different things differently.&quot;  Really, Maggie?  Your claim is the very DEFINITION of discrimination.  Way to flex that Yale education.  The only bright side is that every time she, Brian Brown or anyone else associated with the falsely named National Organization for Marriage argues against same sex marriage, they successfully manage to move the pro-same sex marriage movement forward.  Keep up the good work, Maggie!  I&#039;m totally rooting for you to get air time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also would be extremely happy for Maggie Gallagher to once again take it upon herself to act as U.S moral arbitrator, most ideally in televised hearings.  That way the entire country can watch Maggie continue to solidify her actual role as Chief Bigot, using her comical, hollow, false and unsubstantiated claims of why, in her own words &#8220;It is not discrimination to treat different things differently.&#8221;  Really, Maggie?  Your claim is the very DEFINITION of discrimination.  Way to flex that Yale education.  The only bright side is that every time she, Brian Brown or anyone else associated with the falsely named National Organization for Marriage argues against same sex marriage, they successfully manage to move the pro-same sex marriage movement forward.  Keep up the good work, Maggie!  I&#8217;m totally rooting for you to get air time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue-heron</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/03/23/doma-repeal-supporters-seek-senate-hearings/#comment-19163</link>
		<dc:creator>blue-heron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=19199#comment-19163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defense of DOMA may cost an estimated $600 Million with the use of Outside Attorneys, whilst Republicans complain about Obama&#039;s spending.

Boehner avoided a House Vote by appointing a &quot;bipartisan&quot; committee, one conprised of a majority in favor of his Party rather than representative of the Will of the American People.

Let there be a House Vote!  We need to know exactly which House Members would vote For and Which would vot Against DOMA Repeal (like we don&#039;t already know).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defense of DOMA may cost an estimated $600 Million with the use of Outside Attorneys, whilst Republicans complain about Obama&#8217;s spending.</p>
<p>Boehner avoided a House Vote by appointing a &#8220;bipartisan&#8221; committee, one conprised of a majority in favor of his Party rather than representative of the Will of the American People.</p>
<p>Let there be a House Vote!  We need to know exactly which House Members would vote For and Which would vot Against DOMA Repeal (like we don&#8217;t already know).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corinna - understanding the DOMA at http://www.advice-for-newlyweds.com/defense-of-marriage-act.html</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/03/23/doma-repeal-supporters-seek-senate-hearings/#comment-19160</link>
		<dc:creator>Corinna - understanding the DOMA at http://www.advice-for-newlyweds.com/defense-of-marriage-act.html</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=19199#comment-19160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This explanation of the DOMA was helpful for me: http://www.advice-for-newlyweds.com/defense-of-marriage-act.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This explanation of the DOMA was helpful for me: <a href="http://www.advice-for-newlyweds.com/defense-of-marriage-act.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.advice-for-newlyweds.com/defense-of-marriage-act.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/03/23/doma-repeal-supporters-seek-senate-hearings/feed/ ) in 0.25618 seconds, on May 24th, 2013 at 2:19 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2013 at 3:19 am UTC -->