<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Service chiefs to testify on &#8216;Don&#8217;t Ask&#8217; repeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/04/service-chiefs-to-testify-on-dont-ask-repeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/04/service-chiefs-to-testify-on-dont-ask-repeal/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael@LeonardMatlovich.com</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/04/service-chiefs-to-testify-on-dont-ask-repeal/#comment-19888</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael@LeonardMatlovich.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=19892#comment-19888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hearing conniving collaborationist cow Stachelberg moo over how the Repeal Slow Walk is as delightful as strawberries &amp; creme makes me throw up a little in my mouth. For those unaware, SHE was one of those who helped set fire to the original REAL repeal bill. Under it: 1. DADT would have been over at least by June 24th, &quot;training&quot; or no &quot;training.&quot; 2. The ban couldn&#039;t have been brought back by a future administration [as it could now] without a repeal of the repeal by a future Congress. 3. Gay &amp; lesbian troops would have the same protections against job discrimination &amp; harassment that other groups in the military have such as blacks and women—which they WON&#039;T have now. 4. The Pentagon could not have denied gay/lesbian military partners any benefits not explicity banned by DOMA such as the very important &quot;military housing&quot; while now they are refusing to extend ANY benefits to gay couples as such.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hearing conniving collaborationist cow Stachelberg moo over how the Repeal Slow Walk is as delightful as strawberries &amp; creme makes me throw up a little in my mouth. For those unaware, SHE was one of those who helped set fire to the original REAL repeal bill. Under it: 1. DADT would have been over at least by June 24th, &#8220;training&#8221; or no &#8220;training.&#8221; 2. The ban couldn&#8217;t have been brought back by a future administration [as it could now] without a repeal of the repeal by a future Congress. 3. Gay &amp; lesbian troops would have the same protections against job discrimination &amp; harassment that other groups in the military have such as blacks and women—which they WON&#8217;T have now. 4. The Pentagon could not have denied gay/lesbian military partners any benefits not explicity banned by DOMA such as the very important &#8220;military housing&#8221; while now they are refusing to extend ANY benefits to gay couples as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/04/service-chiefs-to-testify-on-dont-ask-repeal/feed/ ) in 0.25343 seconds, on Jun 19th, 2013 at 1:07 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jun 19th, 2013 at 2:07 pm UTC -->