<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boehner has no estimate on DOMA defense costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/07/boehner-has-no-estimate-on-doma-defense-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/07/boehner-has-no-estimate-on-doma-defense-costs/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/07/boehner-has-no-estimate-on-doma-defense-costs/#comment-20328</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=20486#comment-20328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being out in public is their RIGHT!  They shouldn&#039;t have to hide their relationship for the public.  It&#039;s not the public&#039;s business.  And their marriage, nor the benefits they receive, are anybody&#039;s business either.  Legal marriages deserve equal respect.  There&#039;s no way logic can fit into the argument that if this particular couple gets equal treatment, then the public needs to stick their nose in it.  That&#039;s why this is all unconstitutional.  It&#039;s blatant discrimination and you&#039;re endorsing it!  DOMA a sick, twisted concept and doesn&#039;t deserve any defense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being out in public is their RIGHT!  They shouldn&#8217;t have to hide their relationship for the public.  It&#8217;s not the public&#8217;s business.  And their marriage, nor the benefits they receive, are anybody&#8217;s business either.  Legal marriages deserve equal respect.  There&#8217;s no way logic can fit into the argument that if this particular couple gets equal treatment, then the public needs to stick their nose in it.  That&#8217;s why this is all unconstitutional.  It&#8217;s blatant discrimination and you&#8217;re endorsing it!  DOMA a sick, twisted concept and doesn&#8217;t deserve any defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/07/boehner-has-no-estimate-on-doma-defense-costs/#comment-20145</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 14:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=20486#comment-20145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And just  enforcing &quot;Don&#039;t ask, don&#039;t tell&quot; has COST taxpayers over $500 million since it started being enforced in 1994]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just  enforcing &#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; has COST taxpayers over $500 million since it started being enforced in 1994</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corinna - understanding the DOMA easily at http://www.advice-for-newlyweds.com/defense-of-marriage-act.html</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/07/boehner-has-no-estimate-on-doma-defense-costs/#comment-20109</link>
		<dc:creator>Corinna - understanding the DOMA easily at http://www.advice-for-newlyweds.com/defense-of-marriage-act.html</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 07:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=20486#comment-20109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, Kathy- what two people do in the privacy of their home is their business, but when they want to make it public, get married, get benefits, etc, then it&#039;s not just their business anymore!  That&#039;s why all this is being fought over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Kathy- what two people do in the privacy of their home is their business, but when they want to make it public, get married, get benefits, etc, then it&#8217;s not just their business anymore!  That&#8217;s why all this is being fought over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/07/boehner-has-no-estimate-on-doma-defense-costs/#comment-20069</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=20486#comment-20069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Kathy.  This is another example of Republican hypocracy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Kathy.  This is another example of Republican hypocracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/07/boehner-has-no-estimate-on-doma-defense-costs/#comment-20041</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=20486#comment-20041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if we have no money to fund various social programs that people NEED, how do we have the money for him to defend a discriminatory law such as DOMA?  Oh wait, maybe that&#039;s why you want to defund everything....that way you CAN afford to defend it.  I do not support defending this law.  What 2 people do in the privacy of their home is THEIR business.  He claims he wants smaller government, but that&#039;s only in cases where it affects him and his cronies.  If it has to do with someones beliefs, sexual gender, or a females reproductive system, then we need MORE government involvement.  At least that&#039;s how he&#039;s presenting it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if we have no money to fund various social programs that people NEED, how do we have the money for him to defend a discriminatory law such as DOMA?  Oh wait, maybe that&#8217;s why you want to defund everything&#8230;.that way you CAN afford to defend it.  I do not support defending this law.  What 2 people do in the privacy of their home is THEIR business.  He claims he wants smaller government, but that&#8217;s only in cases where it affects him and his cronies.  If it has to do with someones beliefs, sexual gender, or a females reproductive system, then we need MORE government involvement.  At least that&#8217;s how he&#8217;s presenting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rosenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/07/boehner-has-no-estimate-on-doma-defense-costs/#comment-19953</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rosenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=20486#comment-19953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris- keep up asking the good questions- even when you don&#039;t get an answer you are getting something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris- keep up asking the good questions- even when you don&#8217;t get an answer you are getting something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/07/boehner-has-no-estimate-on-doma-defense-costs/feed/ ) in 0.27915 seconds, on May 20th, 2013 at 2:48 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2013 at 3:48 am UTC -->