<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bracing for possible Hill attack on D.C. marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/21/bracing-for-possible-hill-attack-on-d-c-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/21/bracing-for-possible-hill-attack-on-d-c-marriage/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeeter Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/21/bracing-for-possible-hill-attack-on-d-c-marriage/#comment-21583</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeeter Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=22284#comment-21583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Retardicans in Congress force a rider that repeals D.C. marriage equality law as the price for preventing a federal government shutdown or raising the national debt ceiling, the D.C. government will have, in my opinion, an obligation to challenge the constitutionality of the repeal in federal court.

Denying gay and lesbian couples in the nation&#039;s capital the freedom to marry -- a freedom they effectively earned in 2003 when the U.S. Supreme Court, in Lawrence v. Texas,  fully decriminalized same-gender sexual relationships -- would clearly violate the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Tea Party-dominated GOP freshmen in the House of Representatives have on numerous occasions demonstrated an appalling ignorance of (even contempt for) the very Constitution they are bound by their oath of office to uphold, support, defend -- and obey. 

They already have unconstitutionally rammed through a &quot;bill of attainder&quot; aimed at punishing NPR by defunding the network, in retaliation for an NPR executive&#039;s secretely taped remarks that were highly critical of Republicans in gerneral and Tea Party-backed conservative Republicans in particular. Bills of attainder are strictly prohibited by Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution. Fortunately, the measure has no chance of passage in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Now the Republicans have hired a law firm to defend the constitutionally indefensible &quot;Defense of Marriage Act.&quot; It&#039;s time to call out the Republicans in Congress as the homophobes they really are. As one who lived through the strugles of the African-american civil rights movement in the 1960s, these homophobes in Congress are no better than their racist predecessors who fought against the civil rights movement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Retardicans in Congress force a rider that repeals D.C. marriage equality law as the price for preventing a federal government shutdown or raising the national debt ceiling, the D.C. government will have, in my opinion, an obligation to challenge the constitutionality of the repeal in federal court.</p>
<p>Denying gay and lesbian couples in the nation&#8217;s capital the freedom to marry &#8212; a freedom they effectively earned in 2003 when the U.S. Supreme Court, in Lawrence v. Texas,  fully decriminalized same-gender sexual relationships &#8212; would clearly violate the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.</p>
<p>The Tea Party-dominated GOP freshmen in the House of Representatives have on numerous occasions demonstrated an appalling ignorance of (even contempt for) the very Constitution they are bound by their oath of office to uphold, support, defend &#8212; and obey. </p>
<p>They already have unconstitutionally rammed through a &#8220;bill of attainder&#8221; aimed at punishing NPR by defunding the network, in retaliation for an NPR executive&#8217;s secretely taped remarks that were highly critical of Republicans in gerneral and Tea Party-backed conservative Republicans in particular. Bills of attainder are strictly prohibited by Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution. Fortunately, the measure has no chance of passage in the Democratic-controlled Senate.</p>
<p>Now the Republicans have hired a law firm to defend the constitutionally indefensible &#8220;Defense of Marriage Act.&#8221; It&#8217;s time to call out the Republicans in Congress as the homophobes they really are. As one who lived through the strugles of the African-american civil rights movement in the 1960s, these homophobes in Congress are no better than their racist predecessors who fought against the civil rights movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Dorado</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/21/bracing-for-possible-hill-attack-on-d-c-marriage/#comment-21492</link>
		<dc:creator>El Dorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 05:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=22284#comment-21492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tea Party Fanatics or christian conservative fanatics like the Family Research Council and Concered Women for America? All they exist for is opposing anything that benefits gay Americans so expect an all out attack on marriage equality whenever possible. The GOP using to whine about a Presidential line-item veto power....time to give Obama the same. But just remember this, if the GOP creates the practice of adding social agenda riders to this then we can follow suit someday down the road. What comes around goes around bitch!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tea Party Fanatics or christian conservative fanatics like the Family Research Council and Concered Women for America? All they exist for is opposing anything that benefits gay Americans so expect an all out attack on marriage equality whenever possible. The GOP using to whine about a Presidential line-item veto power&#8230;.time to give Obama the same. But just remember this, if the GOP creates the practice of adding social agenda riders to this then we can follow suit someday down the road. What comes around goes around bitch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/04/21/bracing-for-possible-hill-attack-on-d-c-marriage/feed/ ) in 0.23760 seconds, on May 20th, 2013 at 2:41 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2013 at 3:41 am UTC -->