<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McDermott introduces pro-gay tax equity bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/09/mcdermott-introduces-pro-gay-tax-equity-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/09/mcdermott-introduces-pro-gay-tax-equity-bill/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:19:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Summersgill</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/09/mcdermott-introduces-pro-gay-tax-equity-bill/#comment-24649</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Summersgill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=24586#comment-24649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tax on employer-provided health coverage was eliminated for D.C. taxes on domestic partners in Law 16-59, the &quot;Domestic Partner Health Care Benefits Tax Exemption Act of 2005&quot;, which became effective on March 8, 2006. My testimony for GLAA is at http://glaa.org/archive/2005/glaaondptaxexemptionbill0928.shtml

The current law is:
§ 47-1803.02(a)(2) The following items shall be excluded in the computation of District gross income:
(W) The amount of any health care insurance premium paid by an employer for a non-employee domestic partner, as the term &quot;domestic partner&quot; is defined in § 32-701(3).

The law applies equally to same-sex and opposite-sex couples. Married couples, same-sex and opposite-sex, are not subject to this in their D.C. taxes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tax on employer-provided health coverage was eliminated for D.C. taxes on domestic partners in Law 16-59, the &#8220;Domestic Partner Health Care Benefits Tax Exemption Act of 2005&#8243;, which became effective on March 8, 2006. My testimony for GLAA is at <a href="http://glaa.org/archive/2005/glaaondptaxexemptionbill0928.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://glaa.org/archive/2005/glaaondptaxexemptionbill0928.shtml</a></p>
<p>The current law is:<br />
§ 47-1803.02(a)(2) The following items shall be excluded in the computation of District gross income:<br />
(W) The amount of any health care insurance premium paid by an employer for a non-employee domestic partner, as the term &#8220;domestic partner&#8221; is defined in § 32-701(3).</p>
<p>The law applies equally to same-sex and opposite-sex couples. Married couples, same-sex and opposite-sex, are not subject to this in their D.C. taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/09/mcdermott-introduces-pro-gay-tax-equity-bill/feed/ ) in 0.26189 seconds, on May 20th, 2013 at 7:55 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2013 at 8:55 am UTC -->