<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama asserts marriage issue should be left to states</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: laurelboy2</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/#comment-25447</link>
		<dc:creator>laurelboy2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=25336#comment-25447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s wrong with civil unions anyway?  All &quot;marriages&quot; are essentially civil unions, but with a church or religious twist.  Hang it up and move to the next issue.  Civil unions are fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with civil unions anyway?  All &#8220;marriages&#8221; are essentially civil unions, but with a church or religious twist.  Hang it up and move to the next issue.  Civil unions are fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dottie Laird</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/#comment-25429</link>
		<dc:creator>Dottie Laird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=25336#comment-25429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leaving this to the states is a formula for failure. How many states already have constitutional amendments defining marriage as between one man and one woman, and how many more are on the ballots in states across the country for 2012? More than half. Obama is really &quot;punting&quot; on this issue and still expecting his &quot;fans&quot; will contribute huge sums of money so we can go around in circles for the next four years, with a hat tip here and a mention there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaving this to the states is a formula for failure. How many states already have constitutional amendments defining marriage as between one man and one woman, and how many more are on the ballots in states across the country for 2012? More than half. Obama is really &#8220;punting&#8221; on this issue and still expecting his &#8220;fans&#8221; will contribute huge sums of money so we can go around in circles for the next four years, with a hat tip here and a mention there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurelboy2</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/#comment-25424</link>
		<dc:creator>laurelboy2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=25336#comment-25424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed, executive orders apply only to Executive Branch operating procedures.  The president is precluded from implmenting nationwide equal marriage rights by executive order.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, executive orders apply only to Executive Branch operating procedures.  The president is precluded from implmenting nationwide equal marriage rights by executive order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca Juro</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/#comment-25421</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Juro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=25336#comment-25421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s worth noting that despite GENDA also pending right now in NY and ENDA still a hot federal policy issue, Obama didn&#039;t bother to address the reality that LGBT&#039;s can still be fired from our jobs just for being gay in 29 states and for being trans in 36. In this economy that&#039;s unconscionable, and it demonstrates a detachment and disengagement from the real economic and quality-of-life issues faced by the majority of LGBT Americans that&#039;s at best concerning and at worst deeply worrying to average lower and middle class LGBT working families . 

When you add in the fact that Obama couldn&#039;t even bring himself to mention workplace rights in his Pride proclamation this year, unlike last year&#039;s, I think it&#039;s obvious that once again Obama is apologizing for Democrats screwing over the poor and working class in the 111th Congress by pandering to the concerns of the uber-wealthy. It didn&#039;t work last year and it&#039;s not going to work this time either. It&#039;s time for this guy to step outside of the DC bubble and address the issues the majority of this community care most, employment and jobs, just as in the straight community, about rather than focusing solely on the concerns of the wealthiest 1%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that despite GENDA also pending right now in NY and ENDA still a hot federal policy issue, Obama didn&#8217;t bother to address the reality that LGBT&#8217;s can still be fired from our jobs just for being gay in 29 states and for being trans in 36. In this economy that&#8217;s unconscionable, and it demonstrates a detachment and disengagement from the real economic and quality-of-life issues faced by the majority of LGBT Americans that&#8217;s at best concerning and at worst deeply worrying to average lower and middle class LGBT working families . </p>
<p>When you add in the fact that Obama couldn&#8217;t even bring himself to mention workplace rights in his Pride proclamation this year, unlike last year&#8217;s, I think it&#8217;s obvious that once again Obama is apologizing for Democrats screwing over the poor and working class in the 111th Congress by pandering to the concerns of the uber-wealthy. It didn&#8217;t work last year and it&#8217;s not going to work this time either. It&#8217;s time for this guy to step outside of the DC bubble and address the issues the majority of this community care most, employment and jobs, just as in the straight community, about rather than focusing solely on the concerns of the wealthiest 1%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/#comment-25413</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=25336#comment-25413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am tired of my campaign donations &amp; votes being taken for granted.  I will not make anymore campaign donations until the party takes decisive action &amp; passes gay marriage.
We have seen Obama use executive orders for some tawdry topics.  If he cannot offer the leadership to get gay marriage passed through congress, then I expect an executive order.
Not another penny until this is done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am tired of my campaign donations &amp; votes being taken for granted.  I will not make anymore campaign donations until the party takes decisive action &amp; passes gay marriage.<br />
We have seen Obama use executive orders for some tawdry topics.  If he cannot offer the leadership to get gay marriage passed through congress, then I expect an executive order.<br />
Not another penny until this is done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue-heron</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/#comment-25410</link>
		<dc:creator>blue-heron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=25336#comment-25410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If I am not in the Whitehouse in 2012 who do you think will be addressing Gay Issues?...A Republican?&quot; is what Obama should be saying repeatedly.

&quot;If I Had Not Been elected President in 2010, just how much do you think would have been accomplished on behalf of Gays?&quot; is another point to be made.

Any Republican Candidate, no matter how &quot;Tolerant&quot; or &quot;Supportive&quot; they may attempt to paint themselves during the campaigns, will allow the GOP to dictate that they must legislate to the Far Right.  Merely look at history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If I am not in the Whitehouse in 2012 who do you think will be addressing Gay Issues?&#8230;A Republican?&#8221; is what Obama should be saying repeatedly.</p>
<p>&#8220;If I Had Not Been elected President in 2010, just how much do you think would have been accomplished on behalf of Gays?&#8221; is another point to be made.</p>
<p>Any Republican Candidate, no matter how &#8220;Tolerant&#8221; or &#8220;Supportive&#8221; they may attempt to paint themselves during the campaigns, will allow the GOP to dictate that they must legislate to the Far Right.  Merely look at history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traditionalist</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/#comment-25409</link>
		<dc:creator>Traditionalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=25336#comment-25409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Gaga Lady claims that kids are born with a sexual orientation.  That claim is utterly false.  The Amerfican Psychological Association represents the researchers and scientists in the science of psychology.  Their statement on this question virtually rules out any possibility that sexual orientation is innate.  Go to WWW.APA.ORG and search for &quot;sexual orientation causes.&quot;  See for yourself what the experts have to say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gaga Lady claims that kids are born with a sexual orientation.  That claim is utterly false.  The Amerfican Psychological Association represents the researchers and scientists in the science of psychology.  Their statement on this question virtually rules out any possibility that sexual orientation is innate.  Go to <a href="http://WWW.APA.ORG" rel="nofollow">http://WWW.APA.ORG</a> and search for &#8220;sexual orientation causes.&#8221;  See for yourself what the experts have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wiley</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/#comment-25408</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=25336#comment-25408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was there last night.  Obama didn&#039;t say marriage should be left to the states.  He says what you quoted in your article.  Saying that progress in New York is good is NOT the same thing as saying marriage should be left to the states.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there last night.  Obama didn&#8217;t say marriage should be left to the states.  He says what you quoted in your article.  Saying that progress in New York is good is NOT the same thing as saying marriage should be left to the states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Lovendusky</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/#comment-25401</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Lovendusky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=25336#comment-25401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for being present at the Queer Rising/GetEQUAL demonstration this evening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for being present at the Queer Rising/GetEQUAL demonstration this evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/06/23/obama-marriage-issue-should-be-left-to-states/feed/ ) in 0.37284 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 9:25 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2013 at 10:25 pm UTC -->