Comments on: Is Bachmann’s husband also a client?

By: Galileo

Galileo — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 04:22:28 +0000

“what does her position on reparative therapy have to do with her qualifications to be president?”

Answer: Everything.

By: Songbird

Songbird — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:14:06 +0000

The point that’s being missed is that the Bachmanns are accepting government subsidies for their “clinic”. They’re for small government? Hypocritical methinks? If he looks like a duck, quacks like a duck then surely he is a duck!!!!!

By: Gandolf2u

Gandolf2u — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:04:53 +0000

To laurelboy2 – what planet are you living on? As I’m sure you were so quick to point out about President Clinton’s affair, it’s not that he did it – it’s that he lied about it! But given even that, Bachmann is so totally unqualified on virtually every other front, it’s kind of scary that you can’t even see that! That’s sad for you. As the saying goes — ignorance is no excuse!

By: hleegable

hleegable — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:59:36 +0000

laurelboy2 – reparative therapy? As in trying to repair something that isn’t broken? Been through that. All you end up doing to trying to believe in a lie. I went through my share of hardship until I realize (through prayer) that you have to accept yourself as you are. No lies, to yourself or to others. As far as Bachmann’s position on this having to do with her qualifications to be president, I don’t want a bigot in the White House.

By: laurelboy2

laurelboy2 — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:49:31 +0000

Kevin, you’re stating hearsay as fact. Why don’t you engage in reparative therapy and then report on your experience before you lambast it as heresy? Moreover, what does her position on reparative therapy have to do with her qualifications to be president? Answer: Nothing.