<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOProud calls Social Security a &#8216;Ponzi scheme&#8217; for gays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/09/22/goproud-leaders-echo-perry-ponzi-scheme-social-security-charge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/09/22/goproud-leaders-echo-perry-ponzi-scheme-social-security-charge/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 08:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/09/22/goproud-leaders-echo-perry-ponzi-scheme-social-security-charge/#comment-37528</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 17:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=29137#comment-37528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No private insurance company would be allowed to operate the way Social Security does.  First of all, some policyholders can name a beneficiary (female spouse) while others cannot.  I am a single woman and it makes my blood boil that I have worke my entire life and some &quot;Suzy Homemaker&quot; who sat on her sass all day while her kids were in public school can get more than I do just because she was married to someone with a good income.  What about minority women slaving away in nursing homes who have a less likely chance of marrying a high wage earner?  Or the gay man who has no one who can claim the contribution he paid  if he should die?  Spousal benefits should be eliminated but grandfathered for those over age 35.  The money saved should go to gay partners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No private insurance company would be allowed to operate the way Social Security does.  First of all, some policyholders can name a beneficiary (female spouse) while others cannot.  I am a single woman and it makes my blood boil that I have worke my entire life and some &#8220;Suzy Homemaker&#8221; who sat on her sass all day while her kids were in public school can get more than I do just because she was married to someone with a good income.  What about minority women slaving away in nursing homes who have a less likely chance of marrying a high wage earner?  Or the gay man who has no one who can claim the contribution he paid  if he should die?  Spousal benefits should be eliminated but grandfathered for those over age 35.  The money saved should go to gay partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Esser</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/09/22/goproud-leaders-echo-perry-ponzi-scheme-social-security-charge/#comment-30510</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Esser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=29137#comment-30510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is 100% an insult to my intelligence to compare a fair, good, and open social program to a criminal, fraudulent scheme designed to enrich its operators at the expense of investors. This is nothing but bashing Social Security with a mind toward undermining it. This program has provided economic predictability and stability for eighty years and has benefited all our citizens by doing that. I have known people who worked hard for many years before Social Security even existed. They would have had nothing in their old age if it weren&#039;t for that monthly check that they earned. If this program needs to be better funded, let&#039;s do it. If that means raising taxes, spare us the whining and just do it, Nike.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is 100% an insult to my intelligence to compare a fair, good, and open social program to a criminal, fraudulent scheme designed to enrich its operators at the expense of investors. This is nothing but bashing Social Security with a mind toward undermining it. This program has provided economic predictability and stability for eighty years and has benefited all our citizens by doing that. I have known people who worked hard for many years before Social Security even existed. They would have had nothing in their old age if it weren&#8217;t for that monthly check that they earned. If this program needs to be better funded, let&#8217;s do it. If that means raising taxes, spare us the whining and just do it, Nike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurelboy2</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/09/22/goproud-leaders-echo-perry-ponzi-scheme-social-security-charge/#comment-29767</link>
		<dc:creator>laurelboy2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=29137#comment-29767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is absolutely 100% correct to assert that social security for LGBT Americans is a ponzi scheme.  It&#039;s so obvious I don&#039;t know how anyone could possibly think otherwise.  And, Alexander Stankoff, there are plenty of gay GOPers and Libertarians.  I&#039;m one and I&#039;m proud of being gay.  You need to get out and circulate a bit more, and, as my father used to say, get the stink off of yourself!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is absolutely 100% correct to assert that social security for LGBT Americans is a ponzi scheme.  It&#8217;s so obvious I don&#8217;t know how anyone could possibly think otherwise.  And, Alexander Stankoff, there are plenty of gay GOPers and Libertarians.  I&#8217;m one and I&#8217;m proud of being gay.  You need to get out and circulate a bit more, and, as my father used to say, get the stink off of yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Stankoff</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/09/22/goproud-leaders-echo-perry-ponzi-scheme-social-security-charge/#comment-29737</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Stankoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=29137#comment-29737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A GOPster proud of being gay is a blatant oxymoron...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A GOPster proud of being gay is a blatant oxymoron&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/09/22/goproud-leaders-echo-perry-ponzi-scheme-social-security-charge/feed/ ) in 0.27206 seconds, on May 18th, 2013 at 9:11 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 18th, 2013 at 10:11 am UTC -->