<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gearing up for (another) marriage fight in Md.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/06/gearing-up-for-another-marriage-fight-in-md/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/06/gearing-up-for-another-marriage-fight-in-md/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:39:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/06/gearing-up-for-another-marriage-fight-in-md/#comment-32292</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 17:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=29718#comment-32292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We should bill this, in part, as a religious freedom issue, to counter the other side. There are religious groups that would marry gays if it were legal. A ban on gay marriage makes that religious rite illegal. Allowing people to marry without government approval of their choice of spouse does not affect religious groups that are fixated on sex. No religious group is required to marry all comers, not now, not after the legalization of marriage. However, it does legalize religious rites that are presently and improperly not legal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should bill this, in part, as a religious freedom issue, to counter the other side. There are religious groups that would marry gays if it were legal. A ban on gay marriage makes that religious rite illegal. Allowing people to marry without government approval of their choice of spouse does not affect religious groups that are fixated on sex. No religious group is required to marry all comers, not now, not after the legalization of marriage. However, it does legalize religious rites that are presently and improperly not legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/06/gearing-up-for-another-marriage-fight-in-md/feed/ ) in 0.24406 seconds, on Jun 20th, 2013 at 5:31 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jun 20th, 2013 at 6:31 am UTC -->