<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cain indicates support for Federal Marriage Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/24/cain-indicates-support-for-federal-marriage-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/24/cain-indicates-support-for-federal-marriage-amendment/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: L J</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/24/cain-indicates-support-for-federal-marriage-amendment/#comment-37822</link>
		<dc:creator>L J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30587#comment-37822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only clowns I can see regarding gay marriage are the people supporting it.  Marriage was designed for a man and a woman; nature itself teaches this.  What is a clown?  A person dressed up to cover who or what he or she really is to act in a ridiculous manner.  So, I would say to you, the gay circus is waiting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only clowns I can see regarding gay marriage are the people supporting it.  Marriage was designed for a man and a woman; nature itself teaches this.  What is a clown?  A person dressed up to cover who or what he or she really is to act in a ridiculous manner.  So, I would say to you, the gay circus is waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeeter Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/24/cain-indicates-support-for-federal-marriage-amendment/#comment-37814</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeeter Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30587#comment-37814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herman Cain is a damn fool if he thinks that a federal constitutional amendment to bar gay and lesbian couples from marrying has a snowball&#039;s chance in hell of passage. Constitutional amendments require two-thirds majorities in BOTH houses of Congress -- and ratification by a three-fourths majority of the states -- for passage. 

It&#039;s been tried before -- in 2005, when the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress -- and it failed to come anywhere near the required two-thirds majority. What makes Cain -- or anyone else -- think that such an amendment has a prayer of getting two-thirds?

Cain is an even bigger fool for calling for such an amendment, for he&#039;s clearly forgotten, as an African-American, that there was an attempt a century ago by racist members of Congress, mostly Southerners, to pass a constitutional amendment to outlaw interracial marriages.

That attempt -- spurred by controversy over the interracial marriage of Jack Johnson, the first black world heavyweight boxing champion, to Etta Duryea, a white woman -- also failed to garner anywhere near the two-thirds majorities required for passage. but it DID prompt 18 states -- most of them in the South -- to ban such marriages at the state level -- until the U.S. Supreme Court, in Loving v. Virginia, unanimously declared those laws unconstitutional in a landmark ruling in 1967.

I swear, there ought to be a constitutional amendment to require that candidates for public office have a thorough knowledge of American history, for Cain clearly does not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herman Cain is a damn fool if he thinks that a federal constitutional amendment to bar gay and lesbian couples from marrying has a snowball&#8217;s chance in hell of passage. Constitutional amendments require two-thirds majorities in BOTH houses of Congress &#8212; and ratification by a three-fourths majority of the states &#8212; for passage. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been tried before &#8212; in 2005, when the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress &#8212; and it failed to come anywhere near the required two-thirds majority. What makes Cain &#8212; or anyone else &#8212; think that such an amendment has a prayer of getting two-thirds?</p>
<p>Cain is an even bigger fool for calling for such an amendment, for he&#8217;s clearly forgotten, as an African-American, that there was an attempt a century ago by racist members of Congress, mostly Southerners, to pass a constitutional amendment to outlaw interracial marriages.</p>
<p>That attempt &#8212; spurred by controversy over the interracial marriage of Jack Johnson, the first black world heavyweight boxing champion, to Etta Duryea, a white woman &#8212; also failed to garner anywhere near the two-thirds majorities required for passage. but it DID prompt 18 states &#8212; most of them in the South &#8212; to ban such marriages at the state level &#8212; until the U.S. Supreme Court, in Loving v. Virginia, unanimously declared those laws unconstitutional in a landmark ruling in 1967.</p>
<p>I swear, there ought to be a constitutional amendment to require that candidates for public office have a thorough knowledge of American history, for Cain clearly does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kraig Rasool</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/24/cain-indicates-support-for-federal-marriage-amendment/#comment-37695</link>
		<dc:creator>Kraig Rasool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30587#comment-37695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herman Cain is a clown and needs to seriously consider joining the nearest Circus he can find. Not only is he out of touch with people..his flip-flop of ideas is certainly cause for concern. People need to wake up and see how nonsensical his comments are and burn him at the stake. On the other hand you think to yourself..Mmmm I hope he wins the republican nomination so President Obama can send him back to his Pizza shack, maybe his old employees will listen to his nonsence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herman Cain is a clown and needs to seriously consider joining the nearest Circus he can find. Not only is he out of touch with people..his flip-flop of ideas is certainly cause for concern. People need to wake up and see how nonsensical his comments are and burn him at the stake. On the other hand you think to yourself..Mmmm I hope he wins the republican nomination so President Obama can send him back to his Pizza shack, maybe his old employees will listen to his nonsence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/24/cain-indicates-support-for-federal-marriage-amendment/feed/ ) in 0.28013 seconds, on May 19th, 2013 at 9:14 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2013 at 10:14 pm UTC -->