<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leahy sets committee action on DOMA repeal for Nov. 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/#comment-37819</link>
		<dc:creator>John Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30633#comment-37819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neither repealing DOMA or keeping DOMA is satisfactory for anyone.

We can satisfy everyone by replacing DOMA with an entirely new set of laws that give protections and federal recognition to same-sex couples and their families, preserve marriage as a man and a woman allowed to conceive offspring together, and prohibit labs creating people by any means other than joining a man and a woman&#039;s unmodified gametes.

The Egg and Sperm Civil Union Compromise consists of three laws to be enacted together:

1) Stop genetic engineering by limiting conception of children to the union of a man and a woman&#039;s sperm and egg.
2) Federally recognize state civil unions that are defined as &quot;marriage minus conception rights.&quot;
3) Affirm in federal law the right of all marriages to conceive children together using their own genes.

That&#039;s the Egg and Sperm Civil Union Compromise: Equal Protections, Equal Conceptions. Congress can actually achieve this, and help thousands of families and protect the essential meaning of marriage, and take control of the wild west of human genetic engineering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither repealing DOMA or keeping DOMA is satisfactory for anyone.</p>
<p>We can satisfy everyone by replacing DOMA with an entirely new set of laws that give protections and federal recognition to same-sex couples and their families, preserve marriage as a man and a woman allowed to conceive offspring together, and prohibit labs creating people by any means other than joining a man and a woman&#8217;s unmodified gametes.</p>
<p>The Egg and Sperm Civil Union Compromise consists of three laws to be enacted together:</p>
<p>1) Stop genetic engineering by limiting conception of children to the union of a man and a woman&#8217;s sperm and egg.<br />
2) Federally recognize state civil unions that are defined as &#8220;marriage minus conception rights.&#8221;<br />
3) Affirm in federal law the right of all marriages to conceive children together using their own genes.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the Egg and Sperm Civil Union Compromise: Equal Protections, Equal Conceptions. Congress can actually achieve this, and help thousands of families and protect the essential meaning of marriage, and take control of the wild west of human genetic engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeeter Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/#comment-37815</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeeter Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30633#comment-37815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d much rather see DOMA struck down by the Supreme Court as the unconstitutional violation of the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that it actually is. There are now no fewer than SIX lawsuits challenging its constitutionality precisely on those grounds -- and at least four federal courts already have declared DOMA unconstitutional. 

It will likely take such a ruling by the high court anyway, for I have no confidence that the Respect for Marriage Act that seeks to replace DOMA has any chance of passage in the Republican-controlled House -- and might even be blocked in the Senate by a GOP filibuster. The Democrats, you must remember, still lack the 60 votes in the Senate required to choke off filibusters]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d much rather see DOMA struck down by the Supreme Court as the unconstitutional violation of the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that it actually is. There are now no fewer than SIX lawsuits challenging its constitutionality precisely on those grounds &#8212; and at least four federal courts already have declared DOMA unconstitutional. </p>
<p>It will likely take such a ruling by the high court anyway, for I have no confidence that the Respect for Marriage Act that seeks to replace DOMA has any chance of passage in the Republican-controlled House &#8212; and might even be blocked in the Senate by a GOP filibuster. The Democrats, you must remember, still lack the 60 votes in the Senate required to choke off filibusters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r chandler</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/#comment-37779</link>
		<dc:creator>r chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30633#comment-37779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[repealing it woudl be good then....DOMA prevents gay marriages from being recognized by the federal goverment...replease of DOMA is a GOOD thing for gays]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>repealing it woudl be good then&#8230;.DOMA prevents gay marriages from being recognized by the federal goverment&#8230;replease of DOMA is a GOOD thing for gays</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Perdue</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/#comment-37755</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Perdue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30633#comment-37755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats always play this rotten game. 

When they controlled the Congress and the White House the refused to repeal DOMA or pass ENDA. Now they&#039;re pretending to be on our side because they&#039;re in trouble because they screwed up the economy (with al little help from their Republican and Teabagger cousins).

Republicans are almost as bad as Democrats but at least they&#039;re honest bigots.

Just forget about elections. We should put all our efforts into building mass actions and mass pressure for LGBT right and into building OWS and unions. On November 6th, 2012 vote against Democrats and Republicans. Vote left or even better, don&#039;t vote. Instead, build a demonstration against the bigots in Congress and the Bigot in Chief in the White House.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats always play this rotten game. </p>
<p>When they controlled the Congress and the White House the refused to repeal DOMA or pass ENDA. Now they&#8217;re pretending to be on our side because they&#8217;re in trouble because they screwed up the economy (with al little help from their Republican and Teabagger cousins).</p>
<p>Republicans are almost as bad as Democrats but at least they&#8217;re honest bigots.</p>
<p>Just forget about elections. We should put all our efforts into building mass actions and mass pressure for LGBT right and into building OWS and unions. On November 6th, 2012 vote against Democrats and Republicans. Vote left or even better, don&#8217;t vote. Instead, build a demonstration against the bigots in Congress and the Bigot in Chief in the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/#comment-37645</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30633#comment-37645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to see the damn DOMA repealed, but I don&#039;t have much confidence in this happening. First of all, the bill can get out of the Senate committee, but I don&#039;t think it can get past the full senate due to Republican filibusters and a few turncoat Democrats who would betray us. Even if it did get past the senate by some miracle, it would be dead on arrival in the House which is run by anti-gay Republicans. How I long for the days when Pelosi was Speaker of the House, if only we could replace the Blue Dog Democrats and about 60 Republicans with Progressives we could really achieve equality there, and the same can be said for the Senate where we need to replace about six of the sellout Dems with Progressives; along with about 20 of the gay bashing Republicans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see the damn DOMA repealed, but I don&#8217;t have much confidence in this happening. First of all, the bill can get out of the Senate committee, but I don&#8217;t think it can get past the full senate due to Republican filibusters and a few turncoat Democrats who would betray us. Even if it did get past the senate by some miracle, it would be dead on arrival in the House which is run by anti-gay Republicans. How I long for the days when Pelosi was Speaker of the House, if only we could replace the Blue Dog Democrats and about 60 Republicans with Progressives we could really achieve equality there, and the same can be said for the Senate where we need to replace about six of the sellout Dems with Progressives; along with about 20 of the gay bashing Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/#comment-37629</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30633#comment-37629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this repeal will help us in the future, so that we will have the legality of marriage that is not recognized in federal government right now? so repealing doma will actually approve gay marriage and it will protect lgbt marriage and family. Who don&#039;t you agree with repealing it? 

In addition, repealing doma will ensure that binational LGBT couples will never have to separate and endure huge discrimination and stress that they are going thru right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this repeal will help us in the future, so that we will have the legality of marriage that is not recognized in federal government right now? so repealing doma will actually approve gay marriage and it will protect lgbt marriage and family. Who don&#8217;t you agree with repealing it? </p>
<p>In addition, repealing doma will ensure that binational LGBT couples will never have to separate and endure huge discrimination and stress that they are going thru right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Kessler</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/#comment-37621</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30633#comment-37621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you misunderstand this.  This is the one that says that when a gay couple gets married, they don&#039;t get the same benefits as a man and wife do.  Repealing it should change that and allow all couples to be treated equally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you misunderstand this.  This is the one that says that when a gay couple gets married, they don&#8217;t get the same benefits as a man and wife do.  Repealing it should change that and allow all couples to be treated equally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krystle c.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/#comment-37607</link>
		<dc:creator>krystle c.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=30633#comment-37607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t agree with repealing this. I think everyones allowed and is there choice who they choose to marry, not the public. That&#039;s like telling men and woman to not be allowed to get married. Hate how people are treated for wanting to love who they love.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with repealing this. I think everyones allowed and is there choice who they choose to marry, not the public. That&#8217;s like telling men and woman to not be allowed to get married. Hate how people are treated for wanting to love who they love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/10/25/leahy-sets-doma-repeal-panel-vote-for-nov-3/feed/ ) in 0.29125 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 2:18 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2013 at 3:18 pm UTC -->