<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another shot for DP benefits bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/11/19/another-shot-for-dp-benefits-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/11/19/another-shot-for-dp-benefits-bill/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/11/19/another-shot-for-dp-benefits-bill/#comment-44003</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=31846#comment-44003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am okay with the DOMA as long as the government removes all favoritism towards married couples.  Think about it, marriage is a religious rite so if your religion allows same-sex marriage fine, if not then ok.  That is your religious freedom.  On that note, NO federal recognition should be made for these religious habits.  If the government wants to maintain &quot;family&quot; benefits than that should conform to legal documentation that identifies commitment and legal obligation, not a marriage certificate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am okay with the DOMA as long as the government removes all favoritism towards married couples.  Think about it, marriage is a religious rite so if your religion allows same-sex marriage fine, if not then ok.  That is your religious freedom.  On that note, NO federal recognition should be made for these religious habits.  If the government wants to maintain &#8220;family&#8221; benefits than that should conform to legal documentation that identifies commitment and legal obligation, not a marriage certificate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/11/19/another-shot-for-dp-benefits-bill/#comment-39397</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=31846#comment-39397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad to see them re-introduce the Domestic Partnership Benefits &amp; Obligations Act again. Unfortunately, I don&#039;t think they have a chance of getting it past the GOP controlled House, and of course the Dems dropped the ball by not passing DPBO or ENDA during Obama&#039;s first 2 years when they had a clear majority in the Senate &amp; House. I am all in favor of repealing DOMA and advancing same-sex marriage rights, but I really think they need to focus on passing DPBO and ENDA first, then move on to marriage equality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see them re-introduce the Domestic Partnership Benefits &amp; Obligations Act again. Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t think they have a chance of getting it past the GOP controlled House, and of course the Dems dropped the ball by not passing DPBO or ENDA during Obama&#8217;s first 2 years when they had a clear majority in the Senate &amp; House. I am all in favor of repealing DOMA and advancing same-sex marriage rights, but I really think they need to focus on passing DPBO and ENDA first, then move on to marriage equality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/11/19/another-shot-for-dp-benefits-bill/#comment-39377</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=31846#comment-39377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last I heard, Lieberman opposed marriage equality because he believes we are all somehow required to adhere to his religion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I heard, Lieberman opposed marriage equality because he believes we are all somehow required to adhere to his religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/11/19/another-shot-for-dp-benefits-bill/#comment-39355</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=31846#comment-39355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why don&#039;t they focus their efforts on passing ENDA, which is supported by 80 percent of the American people?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they focus their efforts on passing ENDA, which is supported by 80 percent of the American people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Customartist</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/11/19/another-shot-for-dp-benefits-bill/#comment-39350</link>
		<dc:creator>Customartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=31846#comment-39350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How exactly does this not conflict with DOMA?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly does this not conflict with DOMA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/11/19/another-shot-for-dp-benefits-bill/feed/ ) in 0.28526 seconds, on May 26th, 2013 at 2:55 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 26th, 2013 at 3:55 am UTC -->