<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conferees omit anti-gay provisions from defense bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/13/conferees-omit-anti-gay-provisions-from-defense-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/13/conferees-omit-anti-gay-provisions-from-defense-bill/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeeter Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/13/conferees-omit-anti-gay-provisions-from-defense-bill/#comment-40693</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeeter Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 02:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=32787#comment-40693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it time for the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network to mount a legal challenge to Article 125, now that &quot;Don&#039;t Ask, Don&#039;t Tell&quot; has been repealed?I believe strongly that Article 125 should be challenged under the U.S. Supreme Court&#039;s 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, which declared the 13 remaining state laws that criminalized consensual sodomy unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Constitution is the supreme law of this country, to which all servicemembers are bound by oath to protect and defend. It&#039;s time that the supreme law of this country be enforced and that Article 125 be struck down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it time for the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network to mount a legal challenge to Article 125, now that &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; has been repealed?I believe strongly that Article 125 should be challenged under the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, which declared the 13 remaining state laws that criminalized consensual sodomy unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment.</p>
<p>The Constitution is the supreme law of this country, to which all servicemembers are bound by oath to protect and defend. It&#8217;s time that the supreme law of this country be enforced and that Article 125 be struck down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Gay Amendments Dropped from Defense Bill; Sodomy Ban Stays &#171; MGN: Miami Gay News</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/13/conferees-omit-anti-gay-provisions-from-defense-bill/#comment-40467</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Gay Amendments Dropped from Defense Bill; Sodomy Ban Stays &#171; MGN: Miami Gay News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=32787#comment-40467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Washington Blade adds: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Washington Blade adds: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defense Bill: Be Gay, Get Married, Just Don&#8217;t have Sex &#171; The Idaho Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/13/conferees-omit-anti-gay-provisions-from-defense-bill/#comment-40462</link>
		<dc:creator>Defense Bill: Be Gay, Get Married, Just Don&#8217;t have Sex &#171; The Idaho Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=32787#comment-40462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to the Washington Blade, &#8220;Lawmakers on Capitol Hill unveiled on Monday an agreement on major defense budget [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the Washington Blade, &#8220;Lawmakers on Capitol Hill unveiled on Monday an agreement on major defense budget [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conference Defense bill torpedoes anti-gay language &#124; Hotspyer &#8211; Breaking News from around the web</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/13/conferees-omit-anti-gay-provisions-from-defense-bill/#comment-40459</link>
		<dc:creator>Conference Defense bill torpedoes anti-gay language &#124; Hotspyer &#8211; Breaking News from around the web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=32787#comment-40459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] news from the Washington Blade: Absent from the final bill is language found in the House version that prohibits both military [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news from the Washington Blade: Absent from the final bill is language found in the House version that prohibits both military [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. Defense Bill Keeps America Safe From Committed Couples, Pleasing Sex / Queerty</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/13/conferees-omit-anti-gay-provisions-from-defense-bill/#comment-40458</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. Defense Bill Keeps America Safe From Committed Couples, Pleasing Sex / Queerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=32787#comment-40458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that military bases wouldn&#8217;t get used for same-sex weddings either. However, they&#8217;ve dropped those amendments. Sadly, they didn&#8217;t repeal military Article 125, the code forbidding sodomy‚ ensuring that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that military bases wouldn&#8217;t get used for same-sex weddings either. However, they&#8217;ve dropped those amendments. Sadly, they didn&#8217;t repeal military Article 125, the code forbidding sodomy‚ ensuring that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/13/conferees-omit-anti-gay-provisions-from-defense-bill/feed/ ) in 0.26030 seconds, on Jun 18th, 2013 at 10:11 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jun 18th, 2013 at 11:11 pm UTC -->