<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gingrich: Media has anti-Christian bias on marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/08/gingrich-media-has-anti-christian-bias-on-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/08/gingrich-media-has-anti-christian-bias-on-marriage/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: atty79</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/08/gingrich-media-has-anti-christian-bias-on-marriage/#comment-41711</link>
		<dc:creator>atty79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=33752#comment-41711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since when does the media have a responsibility to tow the line of one specific religion&#039;s view?  If you want coverage regarding religion, go talk to a priest!  I&#039;m sick of religion being talked about in politics as if it has meaning beyond how one lives his own life. This mantra to tell others how to live by your own religious beliefs needs to stop.  Now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when does the media have a responsibility to tow the line of one specific religion&#8217;s view?  If you want coverage regarding religion, go talk to a priest!  I&#8217;m sick of religion being talked about in politics as if it has meaning beyond how one lives his own life. This mantra to tell others how to live by your own religious beliefs needs to stop.  Now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Nardozi</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/08/gingrich-media-has-anti-christian-bias-on-marriage/#comment-41708</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Nardozi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=33752#comment-41708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s what gets me.

All these candidates blabbering on about a &#039;strong defense&#039; and America &#039;controlling the world&#039; and the &#039;war on terrorism&#039;, when you are more like to die from a BEE STING than a terrorist attack. Yes, statistically you are TWO TIMES more likely to die from a BEE STING. Where&#039;s the War On Bees? To make matters worse, NONE OF THEM (except Dr. Paul) seem to consider collapse of the economy a national security threat , even though at this point it is all but inevitable. If unemployment is measured as it was in the Great Depression we have an unemployment rate of 23% - just like it was in 1933, the height of the Great Depression. What part of &#039;National Security depends on the economy&#039; are people not understanding here?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what gets me.</p>
<p>All these candidates blabbering on about a &#8216;strong defense&#8217; and America &#8216;controlling the world&#8217; and the &#8216;war on terrorism&#8217;, when you are more like to die from a BEE STING than a terrorist attack. Yes, statistically you are TWO TIMES more likely to die from a BEE STING. Where&#8217;s the War On Bees? To make matters worse, NONE OF THEM (except Dr. Paul) seem to consider collapse of the economy a national security threat , even though at this point it is all but inevitable. If unemployment is measured as it was in the Great Depression we have an unemployment rate of 23% &#8211; just like it was in 1933, the height of the Great Depression. What part of &#8216;National Security depends on the economy&#8217; are people not understanding here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/08/gingrich-media-has-anti-christian-bias-on-marriage/#comment-41701</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=33752#comment-41701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eighty-four ethics charges were filed against Speaker Gingrich during his term, including claiming tax-exempt status for a college course run for political purposes. However we say it, Mr. Gingrich is all about the money.  In a recent story, “Gingrich was ask to return the estimated $1.6 million he received for providing strategic advice to Freddie Mac, the quasi-government agency (an agency that has lost millions) that guarantees home mortgages. Gingrich has said he acted as a historian, not a lobbyist”.  A “historian”, is that the history of greed?  He may just sell you a book on it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eighty-four ethics charges were filed against Speaker Gingrich during his term, including claiming tax-exempt status for a college course run for political purposes. However we say it, Mr. Gingrich is all about the money.  In a recent story, “Gingrich was ask to return the estimated $1.6 million he received for providing strategic advice to Freddie Mac, the quasi-government agency (an agency that has lost millions) that guarantees home mortgages. Gingrich has said he acted as a historian, not a lobbyist”.  A “historian”, is that the history of greed?  He may just sell you a book on it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/08/gingrich-media-has-anti-christian-bias-on-marriage/#comment-41685</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=33752#comment-41685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is he actually insane? As far as Christian marriage goes, the Christian bible says anyone committing adultery in marriage must be put to death. 

The Seventh Commandment of the Ten Commandments is &quot;Thou shalt not commit adultery&quot; Exodus 20:14. 

&quot;If a man is found sleeping with another man&#039;s wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die.&quot; Deuteronomy 22:22 

&quot;If a man commits adultery with another man&#039;s wife--with the wife of his neighbor--both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.&quot; Leviticus 20:10 

Adultery is condemned in the Old and New Testaments. Adultery is the most widely condemned sexual sin in the bible; he is a total hypocrite, or he is certifiably insane.

If you oppose the death penalty for adultery, then by definition you are anti-Christian. You would hope everyone would be anti-Christian in this respect because ancient people were plain nuts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is he actually insane? As far as Christian marriage goes, the Christian bible says anyone committing adultery in marriage must be put to death. </p>
<p>The Seventh Commandment of the Ten Commandments is &#8220;Thou shalt not commit adultery&#8221; Exodus 20:14. </p>
<p>&#8220;If a man is found sleeping with another man&#8217;s wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die.&#8221; Deuteronomy 22:22 </p>
<p>&#8220;If a man commits adultery with another man&#8217;s wife&#8211;with the wife of his neighbor&#8211;both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.&#8221; Leviticus 20:10 </p>
<p>Adultery is condemned in the Old and New Testaments. Adultery is the most widely condemned sexual sin in the bible; he is a total hypocrite, or he is certifiably insane.</p>
<p>If you oppose the death penalty for adultery, then by definition you are anti-Christian. You would hope everyone would be anti-Christian in this respect because ancient people were plain nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Eldridge</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/08/gingrich-media-has-anti-christian-bias-on-marriage/#comment-41679</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Eldridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 06:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=33752#comment-41679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Candidates continue to regurgitate the Republican mantra that taxes and regulation are the primary factors for job growth, despite two recent surveys and other evidence debunking this myth. For more details on common Republican claims that simply do not square with reality, please check our website:
http://thebottom99percent.com/what-to-watch-out-for-in-weekend-gop-debates/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candidates continue to regurgitate the Republican mantra that taxes and regulation are the primary factors for job growth, despite two recent surveys and other evidence debunking this myth. For more details on common Republican claims that simply do not square with reality, please check our website:<br />
<a href="http://thebottom99percent.com/what-to-watch-out-for-in-weekend-gop-debates/" rel="nofollow">http://thebottom99percent.com/what-to-watch-out-for-in-weekend-gop-debates/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/08/gingrich-media-has-anti-christian-bias-on-marriage/feed/ ) in 0.33029 seconds, on May 19th, 2013 at 7:35 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2013 at 8:35 am UTC -->