<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gingrich comes from behind to win S.C. primary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/21/gingrich-comes-from-behind-to-win-s-c-primary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/21/gingrich-comes-from-behind-to-win-s-c-primary/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/21/gingrich-comes-from-behind-to-win-s-c-primary/#comment-42528</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=34441#comment-42528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[heck ya!! GO NEWT!!! ....i just realized how big of a BOSS Newt is.... and i quote: 
&quot;Andrew Jackson had a pretty clear cut idea about America&#039;s enemies...KILL THEM&quot; 
LOL...come on, he sounds like the ex--cali governator/terminator .. I LOVE IT! 
video: 
http://www.peeje.com/newt-gingrich-americans-want-paychecks-212/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heck ya!! GO NEWT!!! &#8230;.i just realized how big of a BOSS Newt is&#8230;. and i quote:<br />
&#8220;Andrew Jackson had a pretty clear cut idea about America&#8217;s enemies&#8230;KILL THEM&#8221;<br />
LOL&#8230;come on, he sounds like the ex&#8211;cali governator/terminator .. I LOVE IT!<br />
video:<br />
<a href="http://www.peeje.com/newt-gingrich-americans-want-paychecks-212/" rel="nofollow">http://www.peeje.com/newt-gingrich-americans-want-paychecks-212/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I'm Just Sayin'</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/21/gingrich-comes-from-behind-to-win-s-c-primary/#comment-42526</link>
		<dc:creator>I'm Just Sayin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=34441#comment-42526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually Cooper is not entirely correct about the Florida demographic being more reflective of what the GOP nominee will face in the general election.  Yes, the state as whole is more diverse than South Carolina, but Florida is a closed primary (only registered republicans can vote).  In other words you had to be a registered republican on January 3, 2012 in order to vote in the primary on January 31, 2012.

So it is likely that the voters will again be far more conservative than the nation as a whole since independents and moderate democrats cannot participate.  Plus you have some very distinct lines of demarkation with the Red Neck Riviera in the Panhandle which plays a lot like South Carolina, the I-4 corridor which plays Midwestern and South Florida which is wealthy snowbirds and middle-class hispanics with with divergent interests.  In addition Florida has had open voting for the past several days and some 200,000 ballots have been cast before the most recent debate performances, change of fortunes in Iowa and the Romney tax debacle.   So you have a big chunk of under-informed ballots already cast. 

Clearly Romney must win Florida or people will stop whispering about his electability and start openly discussing it.  Gingrich only need come in a close second since no one expects him to win the state given Romney&#039;s early start and resource advantage.   

I can see how Gingrich is a problem for Cooper and an LCR Board desperate to get a candidate that they can endorse so they don&#039;t have to sit on the sidelines.  Then again should LCR really be buying into Romney&#039;s &quot;I&#039;ll do gays no harm&quot; mantra?   Can they be certain with his track record that he won&#039;t change his mind should his political fortunes demand it?   Perhaps its time for LCR to re-examine the whole idea of party affiliation?  Why not show yourselves a little respect by stop kissing GOP butt and rebrand yourself Log Cabin Conservatives?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Cooper is not entirely correct about the Florida demographic being more reflective of what the GOP nominee will face in the general election.  Yes, the state as whole is more diverse than South Carolina, but Florida is a closed primary (only registered republicans can vote).  In other words you had to be a registered republican on January 3, 2012 in order to vote in the primary on January 31, 2012.</p>
<p>So it is likely that the voters will again be far more conservative than the nation as a whole since independents and moderate democrats cannot participate.  Plus you have some very distinct lines of demarkation with the Red Neck Riviera in the Panhandle which plays a lot like South Carolina, the I-4 corridor which plays Midwestern and South Florida which is wealthy snowbirds and middle-class hispanics with with divergent interests.  In addition Florida has had open voting for the past several days and some 200,000 ballots have been cast before the most recent debate performances, change of fortunes in Iowa and the Romney tax debacle.   So you have a big chunk of under-informed ballots already cast. </p>
<p>Clearly Romney must win Florida or people will stop whispering about his electability and start openly discussing it.  Gingrich only need come in a close second since no one expects him to win the state given Romney&#8217;s early start and resource advantage.   </p>
<p>I can see how Gingrich is a problem for Cooper and an LCR Board desperate to get a candidate that they can endorse so they don&#8217;t have to sit on the sidelines.  Then again should LCR really be buying into Romney&#8217;s &#8220;I&#8217;ll do gays no harm&#8221; mantra?   Can they be certain with his track record that he won&#8217;t change his mind should his political fortunes demand it?   Perhaps its time for LCR to re-examine the whole idea of party affiliation?  Why not show yourselves a little respect by stop kissing GOP butt and rebrand yourself Log Cabin Conservatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Klein</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/21/gingrich-comes-from-behind-to-win-s-c-primary/#comment-42518</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=34441#comment-42518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LESSON Learned from SC: Do not underestimate the folly of voters

- how easily they are moved by shrewd 30seconds/30minute ads and 30minute debate performances. SuperPacs seem to have changed outcome results by 10% to 20% as seen in Iowa against Newt Ginrich and in South Carolina in favor of Newt Ginrich.
- how easily they can forget former convictions: The Tea party was against the Washington establishment. Mr Washington, Newt Gingrich, won. Christian conservatives focus on family values and  Mr Ginrich wins although he has the wildest past in this respect .
- how difficult it is for them to follow wisdom. Anger is not a good advisor for reasonable decicions.

Watch: German preacher&#039;s thoughts on 2012 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpLYq525SpM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LESSON Learned from SC: Do not underestimate the folly of voters</p>
<p>- how easily they are moved by shrewd 30seconds/30minute ads and 30minute debate performances. SuperPacs seem to have changed outcome results by 10% to 20% as seen in Iowa against Newt Ginrich and in South Carolina in favor of Newt Ginrich.<br />
- how easily they can forget former convictions: The Tea party was against the Washington establishment. Mr Washington, Newt Gingrich, won. Christian conservatives focus on family values and  Mr Ginrich wins although he has the wildest past in this respect .<br />
- how difficult it is for them to follow wisdom. Anger is not a good advisor for reasonable decicions.</p>
<p>Watch: German preacher&#8217;s thoughts on 2012<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpLYq525SpM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpLYq525SpM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurelboy2</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/21/gingrich-comes-from-behind-to-win-s-c-primary/#comment-42495</link>
		<dc:creator>laurelboy2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=34441#comment-42495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for Newt.  We need someone to kick some butt in this country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Newt.  We need someone to kick some butt in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/01/21/gingrich-comes-from-behind-to-win-s-c-primary/feed/ ) in 0.26398 seconds, on May 26th, 2013 at 8:33 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 26th, 2013 at 9:33 am UTC -->