<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ENDA exec order could protect 16 million workers: report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/06/enda-exec-order-could-protect-16-5-million-workers-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/06/enda-exec-order-could-protect-16-5-million-workers-report/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: devon charles</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/06/enda-exec-order-could-protect-16-5-million-workers-report/#comment-43241</link>
		<dc:creator>devon charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=35379#comment-43241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it almost unbelievable that this executive order could require federal contractors to provide domestic partner health benefits. The federal government doesn&#039;t provide domestic partner health benefits, and house republicans are spending several million dollars to keep that policy in place.
What am I missing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it almost unbelievable that this executive order could require federal contractors to provide domestic partner health benefits. The federal government doesn&#8217;t provide domestic partner health benefits, and house republicans are spending several million dollars to keep that policy in place.<br />
What am I missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/06/enda-exec-order-could-protect-16-5-million-workers-report/#comment-43232</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=35379#comment-43232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this report, Chris. This is a terrific initiative/ proposed directive. It shows how the Obama Administration, even with a decidedly unfriendly House of Representatives, can positively impact LGBT employees of both large and small businesses-- all across the country. 

Owners of businesses-- again, whether large or small, having or seeking federal contracts are already well-aware of civil rights/ non-discrimination protections and practices encouraged and mandated by Uncle Sam, no matter the politics of the states in which they they are located. A LGBT-related directive will simply ADD, affirmatively, and rather quietly, to the &quot;civil rights consciousness&quot; of all federal contractors to include their LGBT employees in their non-discriminatory best practices.

I happen to know that&#039;s especially important in more conservative, &quot;red&quot; states (like Virginia), which have next to no state and local LGBT civil rights protections at all. LGBTs and other minorities are paying attention in the Obama &quot;swing&quot; states, too-- and they very much appreciate the president&#039;s proactive stance. Every little bit helps-- especially for employees of federal contractors in less-urban locales.

Let&#039;s hope President Obama issues that executive order!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this report, Chris. This is a terrific initiative/ proposed directive. It shows how the Obama Administration, even with a decidedly unfriendly House of Representatives, can positively impact LGBT employees of both large and small businesses&#8211; all across the country. </p>
<p>Owners of businesses&#8211; again, whether large or small, having or seeking federal contracts are already well-aware of civil rights/ non-discrimination protections and practices encouraged and mandated by Uncle Sam, no matter the politics of the states in which they they are located. A LGBT-related directive will simply ADD, affirmatively, and rather quietly, to the &#8220;civil rights consciousness&#8221; of all federal contractors to include their LGBT employees in their non-discriminatory best practices.</p>
<p>I happen to know that&#8217;s especially important in more conservative, &#8220;red&#8221; states (like Virginia), which have next to no state and local LGBT civil rights protections at all. LGBTs and other minorities are paying attention in the Obama &#8220;swing&#8221; states, too&#8211; and they very much appreciate the president&#8217;s proactive stance. Every little bit helps&#8211; especially for employees of federal contractors in less-urban locales.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope President Obama issues that executive order!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/06/enda-exec-order-could-protect-16-5-million-workers-report/feed/ ) in 0.24164 seconds, on May 25th, 2013 at 5:17 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 25th, 2013 at 6:17 am UTC -->