<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O’Malley pushes marriage bill in address</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/08/omalley-pushes-marriage-bill-in-address/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/08/omalley-pushes-marriage-bill-in-address/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/08/omalley-pushes-marriage-bill-in-address/#comment-43441</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=35632#comment-43441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The religious protections essentially restate legal principles that are already in effect for the benefit of the clueless members and clergy of sex-based churches. Churches have always been able to make rules about who is and is not eligible to be married in the church, and clergy (as well as lay marriage celebrants in Virginia) can turn people down. Under the first amendment, that can&#039;t change. Broadening civil marriage to include everyone also doesn&#039;t change anything for clerks of the court, since they do not now and never have had the ability to exercise personal discretion about whom they marry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The religious protections essentially restate legal principles that are already in effect for the benefit of the clueless members and clergy of sex-based churches. Churches have always been able to make rules about who is and is not eligible to be married in the church, and clergy (as well as lay marriage celebrants in Virginia) can turn people down. Under the first amendment, that can&#8217;t change. Broadening civil marriage to include everyone also doesn&#8217;t change anything for clerks of the court, since they do not now and never have had the ability to exercise personal discretion about whom they marry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/08/omalley-pushes-marriage-bill-in-address/feed/ ) in 0.23233 seconds, on May 21st, 2013 at 5:30 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2013 at 6:30 pm UTC -->