<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virginia Senate passes anti-gay adoption bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/10/virginia-senate-passes-anti-gay-adoption-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/10/virginia-senate-passes-anti-gay-adoption-bill/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marry, Marry, Why Ya Buggin&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/10/virginia-senate-passes-anti-gay-adoption-bill/#comment-66590</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marry, Marry, Why Ya Buggin&#8217;?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=35764#comment-66590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] birth control.&#160; Republicans are increasingly against same-sex marriage.&#160; They are against adoption by same-sex couples.&#160; They are against changing laws that would give the legal and economic benefits of marriage [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] birth control.&#160; Republicans are increasingly against same-sex marriage.&#160; They are against adoption by same-sex couples.&#160; They are against changing laws that would give the legal and economic benefits of marriage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Majors</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/10/virginia-senate-passes-anti-gay-adoption-bill/#comment-43820</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Majors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=35764#comment-43820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do believe your headline is a lie.  The bill seems to allow people the freedom of association to create private adoption agencies that only place kids with heterosexual couples.  Does it allow creating adoption agencies that are open to gay people?  Or that only service gays and lesbians?  If it does not, your headline is a lie.

If the Virginia state bill merely protects the freedom of association of private Virginia adoption agencies that do not want to make gay adoptions, then of course this same freedom of association is what would allow you to start an adoption agency that specialized in gay adoptions, or lesbian adoptions (or African American adoptions, or that deliberately treated all couples equally, or that had any other special mission).

Just as leftover fascists are currently are trying to force everyone who doesn&#039;t approve of sterilization (etc.) to pay for insurance plans that provide it, they are trying to make it impossible for a pregnant woman who wants to give her baby up only to a specific type of person or couple (gay or straight, two parent, the same race, etc.) to be unable to do so.  Increasing the chance that she might choose abortion.  One can imagine for example, a pregnant woman whose gay siblings had suffered abuse at the hands of a homophobic parent, who discovers from genetic testing that her baby is likely to be gay, who wants to choose an adoption agency that would only place her baby with a gay couple.  Your one size fits all fascism would deny her access to such a &quot;discriminatory&quot; adoption agency.

This is replicated throughout the economy.  Currently it is illegal in DC and many counties and some states for a realtor to tell people whether neighbors, buyers, sellers, etc. are gay or straight.  I once had a lesbian (and socialist) friend and client who was house shopping ask me which blocks or areas were most friendly for a lesbian couple planning a child.  I had to tell her it is illegal in DC for me to provide any information about the neighbors, because sexual orientation is a protected class in DC, and fair housing laws violate real estate agent&#039;s free speech to answer such a question.  If she had wanted to go to Virginia, where sexual orientation is not a protected class, I could have answered her.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe your headline is a lie.  The bill seems to allow people the freedom of association to create private adoption agencies that only place kids with heterosexual couples.  Does it allow creating adoption agencies that are open to gay people?  Or that only service gays and lesbians?  If it does not, your headline is a lie.</p>
<p>If the Virginia state bill merely protects the freedom of association of private Virginia adoption agencies that do not want to make gay adoptions, then of course this same freedom of association is what would allow you to start an adoption agency that specialized in gay adoptions, or lesbian adoptions (or African American adoptions, or that deliberately treated all couples equally, or that had any other special mission).</p>
<p>Just as leftover fascists are currently are trying to force everyone who doesn&#8217;t approve of sterilization (etc.) to pay for insurance plans that provide it, they are trying to make it impossible for a pregnant woman who wants to give her baby up only to a specific type of person or couple (gay or straight, two parent, the same race, etc.) to be unable to do so.  Increasing the chance that she might choose abortion.  One can imagine for example, a pregnant woman whose gay siblings had suffered abuse at the hands of a homophobic parent, who discovers from genetic testing that her baby is likely to be gay, who wants to choose an adoption agency that would only place her baby with a gay couple.  Your one size fits all fascism would deny her access to such a &#8220;discriminatory&#8221; adoption agency.</p>
<p>This is replicated throughout the economy.  Currently it is illegal in DC and many counties and some states for a realtor to tell people whether neighbors, buyers, sellers, etc. are gay or straight.  I once had a lesbian (and socialist) friend and client who was house shopping ask me which blocks or areas were most friendly for a lesbian couple planning a child.  I had to tell her it is illegal in DC for me to provide any information about the neighbors, because sexual orientation is a protected class in DC, and fair housing laws violate real estate agent&#8217;s free speech to answer such a question.  If she had wanted to go to Virginia, where sexual orientation is not a protected class, I could have answered her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Whom</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/10/virginia-senate-passes-anti-gay-adoption-bill/#comment-43648</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Whom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=35764#comment-43648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The bill, SB 349, became known as the “conscience clause” bill because supporters say it would protect the religious rights of faith based adoption and foster placement agencies, many of whom are funded by the state.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Faith-based organizations to taxpayers:  &quot;Freedom of conscience for us, but not for you.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The bill, SB 349, became known as the “conscience clause” bill because supporters say it would protect the religious rights of faith based adoption and foster placement agencies, many of whom are funded by the state.</p></blockquote>
<p>Faith-based organizations to taxpayers:  &#8220;Freedom of conscience for us, but not for you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/10/virginia-senate-passes-anti-gay-adoption-bill/feed/ ) in 0.27666 seconds, on May 24th, 2013 at 6:29 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2013 at 7:29 pm UTC -->