http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/16/queery-bev-stanton/ the gay community's news source Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:48:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/16/queery-bev-stanton/#comment-44268 laurelboy2 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:57:17 +0000 http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=36086#comment-44268 Lisa: thanks for clarifying that because, to me, Bev looks to be about 65!! Remind me to never have Michael Key take a picture at my upcoming nuptials. I’m 54, and I certainly don’t want to look chair-ridden from the local retirement home with my hands slapping around in the wedding cake.

]]> http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/16/queery-bev-stanton/#comment-44241 Lisa Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:08:09 +0000 http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=36086#comment-44241 laurelboy2 – this is a terrible photo of Bev! She actually looks much younger than 45 or even 35. I can’t believe a Blade photographer would choose to photograph a woman of a certain age from this angle!!! Never have a photo taken from below your own eye-level.

]]> http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/16/queery-bev-stanton/#comment-44071 laurelboy2 Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:54:20 +0000 http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=36086#comment-44071 Interesting, but I encourage Bev to spend a weekend at the Spas of Berkeley Springs, West Virginia, where she could away with smoother visual edges and restore the age 45 look again!!

]]>