<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING: MD HOUSE PASSES MARRIAGE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/17/breaking-md-house-passes-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/17/breaking-md-house-passes-marriage/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Agathos Zoe</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/17/breaking-md-house-passes-marriage/#comment-45896</link>
		<dc:creator>Agathos Zoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=36239#comment-45896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I live in Maryland and I would have preferred a defined legal Civil Union.  A lot of details and grey areas are still left in the civil code when you allow same sex marriage... details like prohibitions against a man marrying his mother, sister, aunt, daughter.... etc, had to become generic - a person cannot marry their mother, father, sister, brother, child, grandparent, etc... Why the prohibition at all aside from genetics (and since gays can only adopt, what&#039;s the reason for the prohibition?) We could easily let any two people of the age of consent/age of majority form a legal civil union, but we should have left marriage alone.  Many may disagree with me, I&#039;m sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Maryland and I would have preferred a defined legal Civil Union.  A lot of details and grey areas are still left in the civil code when you allow same sex marriage&#8230; details like prohibitions against a man marrying his mother, sister, aunt, daughter&#8230;. etc, had to become generic &#8211; a person cannot marry their mother, father, sister, brother, child, grandparent, etc&#8230; Why the prohibition at all aside from genetics (and since gays can only adopt, what&#8217;s the reason for the prohibition?) We could easily let any two people of the age of consent/age of majority form a legal civil union, but we should have left marriage alone.  Many may disagree with me, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/02/17/breaking-md-house-passes-marriage/feed/ ) in 0.26528 seconds, on Jun 19th, 2013 at 12:13 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jun 19th, 2013 at 1:13 pm UTC -->