<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carney: No change in White House position on ENDA stopgap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/04/17/carney-no-change-in-white-house-position-on-enda-stopgap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/04/17/carney-no-change-in-white-house-position-on-enda-stopgap/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/04/17/carney-no-change-in-white-house-position-on-enda-stopgap/#comment-47207</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=39414#comment-47207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WH LET THE DOGS OUT...
(So bark we must.)
***
&quot;The more Gay activists bark about what they consider a new slight or a new setback the more ammo it gives at this critical time to the anti Obama and anti LGBT led GOP and Religious Right foes who have big bucks and Bolshevik-like fanatical followers.&quot;
***
Sure, Jim. Yours is the traditional argument for dealing with a terrific political friend who has seemingly, inexplicably (but very publicly, we should also note) reversed course from his commitment to LGBT equality. 

But the downside of remaining silent in the face of this kind of Obama flip-flop is far more risky, IMHO. History is instructive.

We should not forget the 18 years of &#039;Don&#039;t Ask Don&#039;t Tell&#039; which ensued when a rookie President Clinton pulled the same kind of &#039;about face&#039; (literally) with the gay community. We were told then to keep quiet and trust our new friend in the White House to look out for gay rights interests. We should not give &#039;ammo&#039; to his critics. Yadda. Yadda.

Contrary to that &#039;just trust us&#039; advice, we got even worse, federally mandated discrimination with DADT-- and it was codified in a way that tied all future presidents to DADT, without an unlikely reversal act by the congress. 

A Democratic president &#039;compromise&#039; on official &#039;DADT&#039; discrimination, in turn, became the chief excuse in congress NOT to support ENDA. The unspoken reasoning went... &quot;Heck, if a Democrat president can support discrimination in the U.S. Armed Forces, why can&#039;t state, local and private employers do likewise?&quot; So ENDA languished-- for nearly TWO decades more-- and maybe still is.

But the cascading, chilling impact of Clinton&#039;s reversal of his military non-discrimination stance in his &#039;92 campaign was even more destructive of LGBT civil rights-- also for the better part of TWO decades. 

Virtually all LGBT civil rights progress at the federal legislative level came to an end, as well, all but dropping off Congress&#039; radar screen. And that, in turn, halted what could have been much faster legislative progress at state and local levels, too. If hadn&#039;t been for some landmark court decisions (Romer, Lawrence, MA, HI, e.g.) and President Clinton&#039;s subsequent Executive Orders and other actions--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13087
-- well, it would have been a very dry 16 years for LGBT civil rights, indeed.

This latest move, ruling out an Obama Executive Order to prohibit discrimination by federal contractors is a White House gaffe of potentially great proportions-- similar to Clinton&#039;s reversal in &#039;93.

Nearly everyone last week immediately recognized it as bald-faced hypocrisy. But it is not really the &#039;smart&#039;, politically expedient move either. From a twisted viewpoint, it is just as puzzling.

Exactly what net votes has the Obama campaign gained by this decision? It&#039;s far more likely they&#039;ve lost votes by flip-flopping and employing insulting doublespeak against their base. IMO, they have clearly done some damage to their LGBT and liberal base voter blocs. 

History also reminds us that even great, highly intelligent presidents make serious, if unintentional mistakes. FDR, Truman and JFK all reversed course or admitted mistakes on initial decisions that were clearly ill-considered. But, because it didn&#039;t have to happen too often, those are considered noble,even endearing episodes, now.

So all in all, it is good thing that liberal, conservative and independent &#039;dogs&#039; of all sorts are &#039;barking&#039; -- reminding this WH in 2012 of its sudden anti-LGBT hypocrisy.

This president ought to get control of his political peeps and do the right thing-- because that&#039;s usually the kind of guy he is known to be.

(We still love Bo, tho.)
;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qkuu0Lwb5EM&amp;feature=fvst]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WH LET THE DOGS OUT&#8230;<br />
(So bark we must.)<br />
***<br />
&#8220;The more Gay activists bark about what they consider a new slight or a new setback the more ammo it gives at this critical time to the anti Obama and anti LGBT led GOP and Religious Right foes who have big bucks and Bolshevik-like fanatical followers.&#8221;<br />
***<br />
Sure, Jim. Yours is the traditional argument for dealing with a terrific political friend who has seemingly, inexplicably (but very publicly, we should also note) reversed course from his commitment to LGBT equality. </p>
<p>But the downside of remaining silent in the face of this kind of Obama flip-flop is far more risky, IMHO. History is instructive.</p>
<p>We should not forget the 18 years of &#8216;Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell&#8217; which ensued when a rookie President Clinton pulled the same kind of &#8216;about face&#8217; (literally) with the gay community. We were told then to keep quiet and trust our new friend in the White House to look out for gay rights interests. We should not give &#8216;ammo&#8217; to his critics. Yadda. Yadda.</p>
<p>Contrary to that &#8216;just trust us&#8217; advice, we got even worse, federally mandated discrimination with DADT&#8211; and it was codified in a way that tied all future presidents to DADT, without an unlikely reversal act by the congress. </p>
<p>A Democratic president &#8216;compromise&#8217; on official &#8216;DADT&#8217; discrimination, in turn, became the chief excuse in congress NOT to support ENDA. The unspoken reasoning went&#8230; &#8220;Heck, if a Democrat president can support discrimination in the U.S. Armed Forces, why can&#8217;t state, local and private employers do likewise?&#8221; So ENDA languished&#8211; for nearly TWO decades more&#8211; and maybe still is.</p>
<p>But the cascading, chilling impact of Clinton&#8217;s reversal of his military non-discrimination stance in his &#8217;92 campaign was even more destructive of LGBT civil rights&#8211; also for the better part of TWO decades. </p>
<p>Virtually all LGBT civil rights progress at the federal legislative level came to an end, as well, all but dropping off Congress&#8217; radar screen. And that, in turn, halted what could have been much faster legislative progress at state and local levels, too. If hadn&#8217;t been for some landmark court decisions (Romer, Lawrence, MA, HI, e.g.) and President Clinton&#8217;s subsequent Executive Orders and other actions&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13087" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13087</a><br />
&#8211; well, it would have been a very dry 16 years for LGBT civil rights, indeed.</p>
<p>This latest move, ruling out an Obama Executive Order to prohibit discrimination by federal contractors is a White House gaffe of potentially great proportions&#8211; similar to Clinton&#8217;s reversal in &#8217;93.</p>
<p>Nearly everyone last week immediately recognized it as bald-faced hypocrisy. But it is not really the &#8216;smart&#8217;, politically expedient move either. From a twisted viewpoint, it is just as puzzling.</p>
<p>Exactly what net votes has the Obama campaign gained by this decision? It&#8217;s far more likely they&#8217;ve lost votes by flip-flopping and employing insulting doublespeak against their base. IMO, they have clearly done some damage to their LGBT and liberal base voter blocs. </p>
<p>History also reminds us that even great, highly intelligent presidents make serious, if unintentional mistakes. FDR, Truman and JFK all reversed course or admitted mistakes on initial decisions that were clearly ill-considered. But, because it didn&#8217;t have to happen too often, those are considered noble,even endearing episodes, now.</p>
<p>So all in all, it is good thing that liberal, conservative and independent &#8216;dogs&#8217; of all sorts are &#8216;barking&#8217; &#8212; reminding this WH in 2012 of its sudden anti-LGBT hypocrisy.</p>
<p>This president ought to get control of his political peeps and do the right thing&#8211; because that&#8217;s usually the kind of guy he is known to be.</p>
<p>(We still love Bo, tho.)<br />
;)<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qkuu0Lwb5EM&#038;feature=fvst" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qkuu0Lwb5EM&#038;feature=fvst</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Guinnessey</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/04/17/carney-no-change-in-white-house-position-on-enda-stopgap/#comment-47147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Guinnessey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=39414#comment-47147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leave the ENDA issue til after the 2012 elections are over and hopefully Obama will win re-election. The more Gay activists bark about what they consider a new slight or a new setback the more ammo it gives at this critical time to the anti Obama and anti LGBT led GOP and Religious Right foes who have big bucks and Bolshevik-like fanatical followers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave the ENDA issue til after the 2012 elections are over and hopefully Obama will win re-election. The more Gay activists bark about what they consider a new slight or a new setback the more ammo it gives at this critical time to the anti Obama and anti LGBT led GOP and Religious Right foes who have big bucks and Bolshevik-like fanatical followers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/04/17/carney-no-change-in-white-house-position-on-enda-stopgap/#comment-47131</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=39414#comment-47131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president&#039;s political operatives have taken the luster and much credibility off Obama&#039;s claim to be a &#039;fierce advocate&#039; for the human rights of LGBT people. Like so many before them, they have become intoxicated with the power the country has entrusted to them. 

These hacks apparently now arrogantly believe human rights-- such as the right to be free from unwarranted employment discrimination-- are theirs to bestow upon the people based upon patronage and the whims of their election-year schedules. 

They need to be reminded (and in ways they will understand politically) that human rights inure to people from birth into the human species. Governments and governmental leaders can only affirm and protect those existing human rights through appropriate executive, legislative and/or judicial action.

By dodging his ethical responsibility to issue an Executive Branch order, as is within his easy power as the people&#039;s chief federal contracting executive, President Obama has become tacitly COMPLICIT in federal contractors&#039; anti-LGBT discrimination against their employees.

This WH decision will do real harm to a number of LGBT victims, and their families, who are just trying to make a living with some dignity and respect in a tough economy. That&#039;s more than a convenient political flip-flop by this president. It is a profound act of betrayal.

President Obama should reconsider, and do the right thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The president&#8217;s political operatives have taken the luster and much credibility off Obama&#8217;s claim to be a &#8216;fierce advocate&#8217; for the human rights of LGBT people. Like so many before them, they have become intoxicated with the power the country has entrusted to them. </p>
<p>These hacks apparently now arrogantly believe human rights&#8211; such as the right to be free from unwarranted employment discrimination&#8211; are theirs to bestow upon the people based upon patronage and the whims of their election-year schedules. </p>
<p>They need to be reminded (and in ways they will understand politically) that human rights inure to people from birth into the human species. Governments and governmental leaders can only affirm and protect those existing human rights through appropriate executive, legislative and/or judicial action.</p>
<p>By dodging his ethical responsibility to issue an Executive Branch order, as is within his easy power as the people&#8217;s chief federal contracting executive, President Obama has become tacitly COMPLICIT in federal contractors&#8217; anti-LGBT discrimination against their employees.</p>
<p>This WH decision will do real harm to a number of LGBT victims, and their families, who are just trying to make a living with some dignity and respect in a tough economy. That&#8217;s more than a convenient political flip-flop by this president. It is a profound act of betrayal.</p>
<p>President Obama should reconsider, and do the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/04/17/carney-no-change-in-white-house-position-on-enda-stopgap/#comment-47087</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=39414#comment-47087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Change we don&#039;t need?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change we don&#8217;t need?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/04/17/carney-no-change-in-white-house-position-on-enda-stopgap/#comment-47082</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=39414#comment-47082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so typical of the Obama administration as they miss the bus again on LGBT issues. Obama doesn&#039;t lead on any of our issues, he just sits around talking about how he is waiting on Congress to do something, and with the damn Blue Dog Democrats slowing us down nothing got done when the Dems were in the majority in the House and Senate two years ago. ENDA should have been a top priority for Obama and he didn&#039;t do anything to advance it. I give the credit for passage of the Matthew Sheppard Hate Crimes Act and the Repeal of Don&#039;t Ask Don&#039;t Tell to Nancy Pelosi and the other Progressive Democrats in Congress. Someone needs to ask Obama very bluntly about his failure to issue an executive order over ENDA, as well as his failure to support marriage equality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so typical of the Obama administration as they miss the bus again on LGBT issues. Obama doesn&#8217;t lead on any of our issues, he just sits around talking about how he is waiting on Congress to do something, and with the damn Blue Dog Democrats slowing us down nothing got done when the Dems were in the majority in the House and Senate two years ago. ENDA should have been a top priority for Obama and he didn&#8217;t do anything to advance it. I give the credit for passage of the Matthew Sheppard Hate Crimes Act and the Repeal of Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell to Nancy Pelosi and the other Progressive Democrats in Congress. Someone needs to ask Obama very bluntly about his failure to issue an executive order over ENDA, as well as his failure to support marriage equality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/04/17/carney-no-change-in-white-house-position-on-enda-stopgap/feed/ ) in 0.28761 seconds, on May 25th, 2013 at 7:48 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 25th, 2013 at 8:48 pm UTC -->