- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-

BREAKING: Leahy withholds amendments for gay couples in immigration bill
-

Tensions high as Senate panel considers immigration reform
-

U.K. House of Commons approves marriage bill
-

Gay DC psychiatrist named head of APA
-

Gay judicial nominee confirmed to Oregon federal court
-

Capital Trans Pride
-

Sally Ride to receive Presidential Medal of Freedom
Prop 8 case appealed to Supreme Court

Petition asks the high court to specifically review whether or not Prop 8 violates the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)
SAN FRANCISCO — Supporters of California’s 2008 ballot measure limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples have asked the United States Supreme Court to review a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that struck down the law in February.
The petition asks the high court to specifically review whether or not Proposition 8 — which passed in 2008 — violates the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Federal District Court judge Vaughn Walker struck down the law in August 2010 on grounds that it violated the Equal Protection clause, but the ruling earlier this year was much narrower in scope.
According to the Courage Campaign Prop 8 Trial Tracker blog, the defendants seek a SCOTUS review of the decision because it is “exceedingly important,” and the decision conflicts with or misapplies previous Supreme Court decisions.
If the Supreme Court does not overturn the Ninth Court’s decision, a ruling in favor of Perry v. Brown would see marriage rights restored to same-sex couples in California, but perhaps not other states, which the Ninth Circuit may have allowed for in their its ruling, some legal scholars believe.
Tagged with Perry v. Brown, Proposition 8, SCOTUS, U.S. Supreme Court
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.

view print edition
SCOTUS will reject the appeal because the issue is narrowed to California, thereby permitting marriages in that state over 2YEARS after prop 8 was found unconstitutional. “Well, Rosa Parks….you get yer butt to the back of the bus while we diddly your civil rights…..”
[Translate]