- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
Romney & Ryan: Marching into the 18th century
By naming Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) his running mate Mitt Romney has now made it official: He is a total captive of the far right of the Republican Party.
I actually agree with both Republican LGBT groups, Log Cabin and GOProud, which said they consider Ryan a great choice. I too believe he is a great choice — for the Democrats.
Ryan is an ideologue who will be difficult for Romney to deal with. It appears he has already realized that as his campaign tried to distance him from his running mate’s budget by saying as president he will develop his own. During their “60 Minutes” interview, Romney said, “Ryan is a leader in Congress who will help get his agenda passed.” The problem with that statement is that in more than 13 years in Congress Ryan has only managed to get two bills passed into law. The first in 2000 renamed a U.S. Post Office in his district and the second, according to a column in the Huffington Post, was in December 2008, “with legislation to change the way arrows (as in bows and arrows) are hit with an excise tax. Specifically, his bill amended the Internal Revenue Code to impose a 39-cent tax per arrow shaft, instead of a 12.4 percent tax on the sales price. The bill also ‘includes points suitable for use with arrows in the 11 percent excise tax on arrow parts and accessories.’” This, according to Romney, represents a sterling record of leadership.
With Ryan’s selection, this election is now what President Obama wants and believes it should be — not a referendum on his first term but a “choice” election giving voters a clear choice on what the future direction of our nation should be. We either move boldly into the future with President Obama or march backwards toward the 18th century with the Romney/Ryan ticket. If you are a senior, a woman, a member of the LGBT community, the middle class, a Latino or other minority, then there is now a clearer reason to reject the Republican Party.
Romney and Ryan oppose the Dream Act; want to turn Medicare into a voucher program; privatize Social Security; and take us back to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” The Republican Party is for tax breaks for the rich and cuts in college loans for the middle class and the poor. The Republican Party nominated Scalia, Thomas and Alito to the Supreme Court and want more of the same.
Ryan sees himself as a policy wonk, which he is. He is also an ideologue and as with many ideologues he refuses to compromise and stymies progress. Some have called him a “true believer” and for many the problem lies in what he believes. He is for overturning Roe v. Wade; he supports education vouchers and a constitutional amendment banning marriage equality; he opposes allowing gays and lesbians to serve in the military. Ryan co-sponsored a personhood amendment with 62 other Republicans, the Sanctity of Human Life Act, which declares that a fertilized egg “shall have all the legal and constitutional attributes of personhood.” This would in essence outlaw abortion, some forms of contraception and in vitro fertilization.
The Ryan budget claims rising financial aid is driving college tuition upwards and proposes cutting the Pell Grant program by $200 billion, which numerous estimates claim could knock more than one million students off of the program over the next 10 years. In September 2011, Ryan agreed with Rick Perry’s characterization of Social Security as a “Ponzi scheme” and since 2005 has advocated it should be privatized and invested in stocks and bonds.
Mitt Romney went to the far right to win the Republican nomination. His chances of becoming president would have been greatly enhanced had he run on his record as governor of Massachusetts. But that was impossible with those currently leading the Republican Party. Naming Ryan as his running mate has completed his race to the very far right.
Beyond the presidential race, the selection of Ryan could hurt the Republican Party in congressional races. The Ryan budget ideas haven’t faced a national test but in one special election in a Republican stronghold in upstate New York, a District where there are 30,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats and where Ryan’s ideas on changing Medicare were the centerpiece of the election, the Democrat won.
There are less than 12 weeks to Election Day. The choice is clear and I have confidence the American people will choose the road forward rather than marching back to the 18th century with the Republican Party.
Tagged with Barack Obama, Election 2012, GOP, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.



view print edition