<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High court puts off decision on hearing Prop 8, DOMA cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/25/high-court-puts-off-decision-on-hearing-prop-8-doma-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/25/high-court-puts-off-decision-on-hearing-prop-8-doma-cases/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Gable</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/25/high-court-puts-off-decision-on-hearing-prop-8-doma-cases/#comment-64689</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Gable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=49542#comment-64689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought the NOM Maine case was decided with SCOTUS denial of cert in February.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the NOM Maine case was decided with SCOTUS denial of cert in February.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esperando</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/25/high-court-puts-off-decision-on-hearing-prop-8-doma-cases/#comment-64685</link>
		<dc:creator>Esperando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=49542#comment-64685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If the Supreme Court decides not to the hear Prop 8 cases, it would have an immediate impact for gay couples living in California because they would be able to marry as soon as the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had struck down Prop 8, issues a mandate saying the injunction against the anti-gay measure is in effect.&quot;  I just wanted to point out that the 9th circuit has already issued this mandate; it will go into effect as soon as the Supreme Court declines to hear the case (if they end up denying cert.)  If they agree to hear it, then all bets are off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If the Supreme Court decides not to the hear Prop 8 cases, it would have an immediate impact for gay couples living in California because they would be able to marry as soon as the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had struck down Prop 8, issues a mandate saying the injunction against the anti-gay measure is in effect.&#8221;  I just wanted to point out that the 9th circuit has already issued this mandate; it will go into effect as soon as the Supreme Court declines to hear the case (if they end up denying cert.)  If they agree to hear it, then all bets are off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/25/high-court-puts-off-decision-on-hearing-prop-8-doma-cases/feed/ ) in 0.27336 seconds, on May 24th, 2013 at 3:12 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2013 at 4:12 pm UTC -->