<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax planning considerations as 2013 nears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/27/tax-planning-considerations-as-2013-nears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/27/tax-planning-considerations-as-2013-nears/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/27/tax-planning-considerations-as-2013-nears/#comment-66220</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=49730#comment-66220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the feedback Shannon.  There aren&#039;t too many tax changes that will affect low-income earners, apart from the general increases in rates applicable to investment income.  The most significant change that low-income earners will want to be aware of is the elimination of the 10% tax bracket for ordinary income (e.g., wages).  All taxpayers in this bracket are schedule to be bumped into the 15% bracket if the law is not changed (and currently both major political parties are in favor of keeping a lower bracket in place).  In any event, employees should confirm with their employers that they are withholding the correct percentages next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback Shannon.  There aren&#8217;t too many tax changes that will affect low-income earners, apart from the general increases in rates applicable to investment income.  The most significant change that low-income earners will want to be aware of is the elimination of the 10% tax bracket for ordinary income (e.g., wages).  All taxpayers in this bracket are schedule to be bumped into the 15% bracket if the law is not changed (and currently both major political parties are in favor of keeping a lower bracket in place).  In any event, employees should confirm with their employers that they are withholding the correct percentages next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/27/tax-planning-considerations-as-2013-nears/#comment-65035</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=49730#comment-65035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is great information here. However, it is targeted to only a small portion of our community -- those who make enough money to actually have things like stocks and IRAs. As written, it should really be titled, &quot;Tax planning considerations for rich people as 2013 nears.&quot; What about low-income LGBT people? Your article completely ignores their existence and the deep need they have for any financial assistance that they could get. This is unacceptable. If you&#039;re going to write with an upper-class bias or exclusive focus, at least be open about admitting it in the text or title of your piece!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is great information here. However, it is targeted to only a small portion of our community &#8212; those who make enough money to actually have things like stocks and IRAs. As written, it should really be titled, &#8220;Tax planning considerations for rich people as 2013 nears.&#8221; What about low-income LGBT people? Your article completely ignores their existence and the deep need they have for any financial assistance that they could get. This is unacceptable. If you&#8217;re going to write with an upper-class bias or exclusive focus, at least be open about admitting it in the text or title of your piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/09/27/tax-planning-considerations-as-2013-nears/feed/ ) in 0.33335 seconds, on May 19th, 2013 at 7:50 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2013 at 8:50 am UTC -->