<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LGBT issues again absent from prez debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/17/lgbt-issues-again-absent-from-prez-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/17/lgbt-issues-again-absent-from-prez-debate/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Guinnessey</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/17/lgbt-issues-again-absent-from-prez-debate/#comment-73476</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Guinnessey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=50777#comment-73476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Other than the media desiring to raise and inject more havoc over LGBT issues in this presidential race  what is the value of including already detailed policies of both Parties in these irksome debates? Clearly everyone already knows that the GOP for over a year has stated its hostility towards not only LGBT issues but to LGBT persons as well ( Bachmann, Santorum, Huckabee, Cain, Romney, Ryan, and the phoney Religious Right,etc.). We already know what the Democrat Party favorable views and policies promulgated by the Obama Administration on LGBT issues happen to be.The Right leaning media just wants to stir up a storm for its own vain and partisan purposes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than the media desiring to raise and inject more havoc over LGBT issues in this presidential race  what is the value of including already detailed policies of both Parties in these irksome debates? Clearly everyone already knows that the GOP for over a year has stated its hostility towards not only LGBT issues but to LGBT persons as well ( Bachmann, Santorum, Huckabee, Cain, Romney, Ryan, and the phoney Religious Right,etc.). We already know what the Democrat Party favorable views and policies promulgated by the Obama Administration on LGBT issues happen to be.The Right leaning media just wants to stir up a storm for its own vain and partisan purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison Jane Foust</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/17/lgbt-issues-again-absent-from-prez-debate/#comment-73445</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison Jane Foust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=50777#comment-73445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why even bother getting a quote from the Log Cabin Republician mouth pieces? They&#039;ve been more than happy to throw LGBT people under the bus to line their own pockets. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why even bother getting a quote from the Log Cabin Republician mouth pieces? They&#039;ve been more than happy to throw LGBT people under the bus to line their own pockets. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGBT Issues Not Discussed at 2nd Presidential Debate &#171; Connecticut Lesbian and Gay Law</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/17/lgbt-issues-again-absent-from-prez-debate/#comment-73380</link>
		<dc:creator>LGBT Issues Not Discussed at 2nd Presidential Debate &#171; Connecticut Lesbian and Gay Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=50777#comment-73380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] more, read:   LGBT issues again absent from prez debate Like this:LikeBe the first to like this.   This entry was posted in Lesbian and Gay Rights and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more, read:   LGBT issues again absent from prez debate Like this:LikeBe the first to like this.   This entry was posted in Lesbian and Gay Rights and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/17/lgbt-issues-again-absent-from-prez-debate/#comment-72709</link>
		<dc:creator>Major Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=50777#comment-72709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whew! Welcome back to terra firma, Mr. President!!!
In the future, please leave space to the cadets.
Forward,
Major Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew! Welcome back to terra firma, Mr. President!!!<br />
In the future, please leave space to the cadets.<br />
Forward,<br />
Major Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/17/lgbt-issues-again-absent-from-prez-debate/feed/ ) in 0.29026 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 9:21 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2013 at 10:21 am UTC -->