<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nadler pushes DOMA repeal, despite recent court rulings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/24/nadler-pushes-doma-repeal-despite-recent-court-rulings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/24/nadler-pushes-doma-repeal-despite-recent-court-rulings/</link>
	<description>the gay community&#039;s news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: RVJ</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/24/nadler-pushes-doma-repeal-despite-recent-court-rulings/#comment-77875</link>
		<dc:creator>RVJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=51261#comment-77875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironically, a Congressional repeal of DOMA before SCOTUS acts would moot the case and prevent SCOTUS from finding a fundamental right to same-sex marriage or that &quot;heightened scrutiny&quot; should apply to homosexual classifications.  Either such finding will lead to marriage equality in every state.  If the case were mooted before such a finding, then state marriage bans would remain in place.  Might that fact lead some Republicans to support the Respect for Marriage Act?  Probably not.  Republicans aren&#039;t that smart.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, a Congressional repeal of DOMA before SCOTUS acts would moot the case and prevent SCOTUS from finding a fundamental right to same-sex marriage or that &#8220;heightened scrutiny&#8221; should apply to homosexual classifications.  Either such finding will lead to marriage equality in every state.  If the case were mooted before such a finding, then state marriage bans would remain in place.  Might that fact lead some Republicans to support the Respect for Marriage Act?  Probably not.  Republicans aren&#8217;t that smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/24/nadler-pushes-doma-repeal-despite-recent-court-rulings/#comment-77811</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=51261#comment-77811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better hurry.....Romney will defend DOMA, solicit a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage (NOM Pledge) and amend the constitution to ban ALL abortions. Read the Republican Platform...it&#039;s all there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better hurry&#8230;..Romney will defend DOMA, solicit a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage (NOM Pledge) and amend the constitution to ban ALL abortions. Read the Republican Platform&#8230;it&#039;s all there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/24/nadler-pushes-doma-repeal-despite-recent-court-rulings/feed/ ) in 0.33500 seconds, on May 21st, 2013 at 7:29 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2013 at 8:29 pm UTC -->