Comments on: Marriage equality at stake in N.H. gubernatorial race http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/11/01/marriage-equality-at-stake-in-n-h-gubernatorial-race/ the gay community's news source Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:03:59 +0000 hourly 1 By: Harry Underwood http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/11/01/marriage-equality-at-stake-in-n-h-gubernatorial-race/#comment-80974 Harry Underwood Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:17:02 +0000 http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=51918#comment-80974 It shows exactly how divided the GOP is over a key part of their written platform in states like NH. Why should they be given carte blanche to keep power by the LGBTs unless the GOP amend their platform to be more inclusive of LGBTs?

Those who voted no or abstained did so outside of their own party lines. Not a good image for them, IMO.

]]> By: Tim http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/11/01/marriage-equality-at-stake-in-n-h-gubernatorial-race/#comment-80660 Tim Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:06:18 +0000 http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=51918#comment-80660 Clearly, the GOP must not be allowed to win the governors rce in New Hampshire. I want to know if its possible for the Dems to win back control of the State House in New Hampshire, or at least win back a sizeable number of seats to reduce the rotten GOPs ability to take away marriage rights in the states.

]]> By: Timothy Kincaid http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/11/01/marriage-equality-at-stake-in-n-h-gubernatorial-race/#comment-80653 Timothy Kincaid Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:50:21 +0000 http://www.washingtonblade.com/?p=51918#comment-80653 Okay this is nothing but hype and fear. In the vote this year, the MAJORITY OF REPUBLICANS either voted no or didn't vote: 119 Republicans voted yes, 115 Republicans voted no, and 59 didn't vote. And that was supposed to be because of an expected veto? Don't think so.

]]>